Teams

Jim Hunt

Northern Tier - Adults · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-27vs Andy WhyteLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Butler / Bill Kibler vs Andy Mowery / Daniel Cullina1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs Andy WhyteLost 02
L#1 DoublesHongkyu Koh / David Joachim vs Andy Mowery / Daniel Cullina3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNan Zhu vs Jonathan Dexter0-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs Andy WhyteLost 12
L#1 DoublesNan Zhu / Bill Kibler vs Andy Mowery / Daniel Cullina4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJames Hunt vs Jonathan Dexter4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRich Santillo / Hongliang LI vs Matthew Prosek / Andrew Whyte6-0, 6-1
2026-06-02vs Andy WhyteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAyush Pandey / Rich Santillo vs Daniel Cullina / Andy Mowery6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Joachim / Bill Kibler vs Tieyuan Zhu / Gregory Fox4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-30vs Andy WhyteWon 30
W#1 DoublesAyush Pandey / Hongkyu Koh vs Duane Gustafson / Daniel Cullina6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPeter Butler vs Tieyuan Zhu1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Kibler / James Hunt vs John Han / Andrew Whyte6-2, 6-1
2026-05-12vs Andy WhyteLost 13
W#1 DoublesRich Santillo / Hongkyu Koh vs Tieyuan Zhu / Daniel Cullina6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesNan Zhu vs Jonathan Dexter0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBen Fry / Peter Butler vs Gregory Fox / Andrew Whyte0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJames Hunt vs Andy Mowery2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Andy Whyte0512817142
2Jim Hunt0581225178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Rich Santillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Bill Kibler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.03
Peter Butler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
James Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.86
Ayush Pandey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
David Joachim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Nan Zhu
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Hunt + Bill Kibler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rich Santillo
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.25
3
Bill Kibler
11W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Peter Butler
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
James Hunt
25W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Ayush Pandey
8W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
David Joachim
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nan Zhu
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.