Teams

Queen City

2025 OH OV SUMMER Career A18&O Cincinnati · 2025 Summer A18&O 4.0 MEN Cincinnati

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 Summer A18&O 4.0 MEN Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harpers6119921207
2Queen City1691943313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Alexander Kang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Eric Inglert
published
Eric Slayton
published
Fabian Schmahl
published
Gary Riffle
published
James Tempfli
published
Joseph Berk
published
Kevin Goldner
published
Lucas Cooley
published
Pablo Arce
published
Paul Spence
published
Ryan Howell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Goldner + Joseph Berk6066% gamesnot enough data
Paul Spence + Eric Inglert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexander Kang
22W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Eric Inglert
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Slayton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Fabian Schmahl
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Riffle
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Tempfli
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Berk
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Goldner
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucas Cooley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pablo Arce
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Spence
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Howell
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.