← Teams

LOTC-Semonsen

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.75
Jerome Deluz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Danny Denning
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Natasha Rinard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Ron Press
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Nora Semonsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-03-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJerome Deluz / MICHELLE LY vs Jeff Lipke / Ann Skoog6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs Sara Weinstein / GEOFFREY BELL6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Nora Semonsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-25Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDanny Denning / Shaun Anderson vs Lyudmila Leissler / Sebastian Llados Vila6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRon Press / Kimberly Seely vs Rachel Novak / Ruben Alaniz6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Lavios / Abby Hata vs Douglas Hill / Joy Kolesnikoff6-4, 3-4
2024-02-24Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Paul Best vs Teresa Darling / Patrick Clancy6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNora Semonsen / Kevin Semonsen vs JT Smith / Stephanie Smith6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Lavios / Natasha Rinard vs Mike Olson / Nenette Olson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerome Deluz / Nora Semonsen vs ALFREDO ALANIS / ROSY ALANIS6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristi Vargas / Paul Best vs Karl Kropp / Bernice Zhang6-1, 6-4
2024-02-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRon Press / Kimberly Seely vs Jeff Marshall / Jayne Mitchell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShaun Anderson / Kevin Semonsen vs Shelly Cruze / Gerald Chase6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-04Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesShaun Anderson / Danny Denning vs Trylla Lembke / Alan Jones6-3, 1-1
L#2 DoublesRon Press / Kimberly Seely vs Tina Clancy / Patrick Clancy6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNora Semonsen / Kevin Semonsen vs Stephen Crook / Lorna Goth6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2024-01-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / David Oh vs Xiaolu Huang / Gabriel Weaver7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMICHELLE LY / Jerome Deluz vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNatasha Rinard / Wally Lee vs PHAT Lee / Thu Truong6-4, 7-5
2024-01-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNatasha Rinard / Michael Lavios vs Rob Laing / Kimberly Stockstad6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Denning / Shaun Anderson vs Scott Powers / Debbie Frankel6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / David Oh vs John Boelling / Betty Roux6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Jerome Deluz
17W–16L career · type M
3%95%1%
3.75
4
Danny Denning
64W–77L career
37%63%0%
3.48
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Natasha Rinard
57W–51L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Ron Press
40W–41L career
2%98%0%
3.19
3
Nora Semonsen
47W–70L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.