Teams

FTA18A/Haviland/Jain

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-04-30vs FTA18A/HollyTree/SassoWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Michelle Sykes6-2, 6-1
2024-03-10vs FTA18A/HollyTree/SassoLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Britton Groblewski4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Carter MacNabb
published 4.5
4.20
Jennifer Milne
published
4.15
Anna Sharp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Kelly Hesketh
published
4.12
Rhonda Watson
published
4.11
Tara Walters
published
4.08
Carol Hayduk
published 4.5
4.01
Brenna Feirer
published 4.5
3.87
Liza Feniger
published
3.80
Michele Jain
published
3.79
Hallie Kennedy
published
3.71
Dorie Fann
published
3.65
Julianne Foster
published
Leslie Fite
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorie Fann + Liza Feniger3355% gamesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Rhonda Watson134 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Watson + Liza Feniger404 matchesnot enough data
Dorie Fann + Kelly Hesketh404 matchesnot enough data
Michele Jain + Julianne Foster134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Dorie Fann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Carter MacNabb
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Milne
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Anna Sharp
62W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Kelly Hesketh
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.13
Rhonda Watson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Tara Walters
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Carol Hayduk
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Brenna Feirer
21W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Liza Feniger
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Michele Jain
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.80
Hallie Kennedy
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.79
Dorie Fann
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Julianne Foster
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
Leslie Fite
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.