Teams

DEAN - 18+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-29vs Easley 18+ 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Ganim / Diane Majestic vs Ginger Hayworth / Elaine Fox6-0, 6-1
2022-09-22vs Westrick - 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ganim / Diane Majestic vs Trish Holder / Rhyssa Earley6-2, 6-2
2022-09-15vs Pretzsch 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Dean / Diane Majestic vs Sallie Bett Theall / Vangie Cruz7-6, 6-1
2022-09-01vs Goy/Walker 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Eberhard / Diane Majestic vs Cari Powell / Kristin Williamson6-2, 6-0
2022-08-25vs Easley 18+ 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Majestic / Kimberly Eberhard vs Angela Muller / Dell Barbee6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Majestic / Kimberly Eberhard vs Melissa Goodman / Cheryl Scott7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-11vs Pretzsch 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Eberhard / Diane Majestic vs Lisa Cassidy / Melaney Gee6-2, 6-3
2022-08-04vs Dulin - 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Majestic / Kimberly Eberhard vs Lynn Jacoby / Betty Kramer6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Carrie Ganim
published 4
Bee Baker
published 4
3.72
Christine Hinch
published 4
3.70
Diane Majestic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Kimberly Eberhard
published
3.61
Tonya Lomas
published
3.60
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.40
Patty Craig
published
3.37
Karen Lubeck Smith
published
3.14
Mary Dean
published
Josie Whitmore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Ganim + Mary Dean303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Ganim
25W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Bee Baker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christine Hinch
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Kimberly Eberhard
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Tonya Lomas
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.61
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Patty Craig
33W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Karen Lubeck Smith
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Mary Dean
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Josie Whitmore
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.