Teams

4.TOC.Holloman

2022 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-08vs 2.LOCH.FeuersteinWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Andy Holloman vs Hugh Esleeck / Charles Newsome6-1, 6-3
2022-05-01vs 3.TOC.ClanceyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Wood / Steve Pigora vs Mitch Strobin / Scott Hoffman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGlen Hacker / Steve Pigora vs Daniel McDonald / Kevin Michaels3-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs 5.TOC.StognerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Donald Wood vs Daniel McDonald / John Kata6-3, 6-0
2022-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Holloman / Steve Pigora vs Bill Feuerstein / Hugh Esleeck6-1, 6-4
2022-03-13vs 3.TOC.ClanceyLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlen Hacker / Steve Pigora vs David Drossman / Stan Lucas3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Andy Holloman
published 3.5
3.25
Steve Pigora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.18
Glen Hacker
published 3.5
Sergei Krasnyanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pigora + Glen Hacker314 matchesnot enough data
Steve Pigora + Andy Holloman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Holloman
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Glen Hacker
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Sergei Krasnyanski
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.