Teams

ALPINE HILLS CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

25 players · average NTRP 2.95 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 25 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Allison Moser
published 3.5
3.11
Hayley Bakken
published 3
3.01
Janeen Poutre
published
2.92
Catherine Gillis
published 3
2.92
Lauren Bochnowski
published
2.90
Aimee Armsby
published 3
2.84
Dale Lachtman
published 3
2.77
Emily Lopez
published 3
2.77
Maria Matsumoto
published
2.72
Alisha Senescu
published 3
2.72
Elise Gabrielson
published 3
2.68
Renata Dionello
published
2.66
Jami Worthington
published 3
2.62
Samantha Bufton
published
2.61
Melissa Land
published
2.58
Olivia Ward
published
2.52
Patricia Bors
published
2.51
Julie Harding
published
2.49
Kristin Brew
published
2.43
Alana Achterkirchen
published 2.5
2.40
Patricia Law
published
2.25
Wendi Karam
published
2.20
Marjel Scheuer
published
2.20
Denby Sellers
published 2.5
2.18
Sallie DeGolia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Armsby + Samantha Bufton3257% gamesnot enough data
Emily Lopez + Dale Lachtman314 matchesnot enough data
Denby Sellers + Maria Matsumoto404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Gillis + Hayley Bakken213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Harding + Maria Matsumoto213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bors + Maria Matsumoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Moser
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Hayley Bakken
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Janeen Poutre
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Catherine Gillis
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lauren Bochnowski
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Dale Lachtman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Emily Lopez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Maria Matsumoto
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
3
Alisha Senescu
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Elise Gabrielson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Renata Dionello
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.68
3
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Samantha Bufton
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Olivia Ward
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
Patricia Bors
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Julie Harding
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Kristin Brew
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Alana Achterkirchen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Patricia Law
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Wendi Karam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Marjel Scheuer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Denby Sellers
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Sallie DeGolia
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.