Teams

Lady Acers

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-17vs No LoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Phyllis Anderson vs Michelle Washington / Linda Washington6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Rise Lancoon vs Martha Givan / Natalie Anderson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnette James / LaTonya Young-Clayborne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-16vs Serving YouWon 20
W#1 SinglesCortney Mukushi vs JENNIFER JOY7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Rise Lancoon vs Thaddisa Fulwood / Sheane Robinson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-10vs LoVVWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Roxie Landry6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Phyllis Anderson vs Tammy Bresnahan / Plezzie Heade6-1, 6-3
2022-07-09vs No LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnette James / Cortney Mukushi vs Gwendolyn Vauss / Julie Anderson6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Novella Bridges6-3, 7-5
2022-07-03vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesRise Lancoon / Angela Gallacher vs Sherri Colston / Wanda Fells4-6, 5-7
2022-07-02vs LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Deborah Gebhardt vs Tammy Bresnahan / Sheila Jennings6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.88
Cortney Mukushi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Angela Gallacher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Chelbe Williams
published 3
2.50
Gail Taylor
published 3
2.44
Rise Lancoon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Taylor + Chelbe Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Angela Gallacher + Cortney Mukushi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
99W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Cortney Mukushi
59W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Angela Gallacher
48W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Chelbe Williams
45W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Diana Williams Gibau
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gail Taylor
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Rise Lancoon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.