Teams

Bigham - NC - Snowden

2023 Tri-Level Doubles 40&Over-NC · Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Holly Bigham
published
3.06
Julie Parks
published
3.03
Rachel Heun
published
3.02
Jessica Elrod
published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
published 3
2.80
Michele Henley
published
Amy Mullens
published 3
2.72
Tiffany Gililland
published
2.69
Suzanne Speltz
published
Cynthia Bigham
published 2.5
Jill Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Speltz + Michele Henley404 matchesnot enough data
Holly Bigham + Jill Ward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Bigham
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
Julie Parks
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Rachel Heun
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Jessica Elrod
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Michele Henley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Amy Mullens
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Gililland
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
2.72
Suzanne Speltz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Cynthia Bigham
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Ward
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.