Teams

CCV DeLacey

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Weekday Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-20vs WOCC WilderWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Katherine Shiveley vs Page Kral / Maya Wilder7-6, 6-4
2023-07-13vs ACAC Colberg Wise ACESLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shiveley / Sarah Dickinson vs Julie Ruth / Sonya Carman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Donna Butler vs Emily Chaikin / Kristen Walton6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-06vs Westwood HauseLost 01
L#3 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Anne Robertson Starke vs Kristy Seredni / Laura Strickler2-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs Woodlake GlenLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Kerry DeLacey vs Brooke Teefey / Jennifer Thaxton3-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs CCV AveryLost 02
L#1 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Lindalee Mulligan vs Courtney Harper / Karen Williamson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Katherine Shiveley vs Elizabeth Martin / Nancy Taylor4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Sarah Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Donna Butler
published 4
3.61
Mary Bartzen
published
3.58
Tara Bennett
published
3.40
Laura West Hatcher
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
3.17
Shula Good
published
3.11
Lauren Hepper
published
Lindalee Mulligan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Sarah Dickinson
47W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Donna Butler
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Bartzen
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
Tara Bennett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Laura West Hatcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Shula Good
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Robertson Starke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Lauren Hepper
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindalee Mulligan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.