Teams

OC NBTC - Christina - Sun2

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women- 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-22vs OC LLW Heritage Park - Michelle/LyLost 01
L#1 DoublesTRAM LY / Karen Trinh vs Connie Espina / Katie Moore5-7, 5-7
2024-09-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTRAM LY / Hannah Highsmith vs Amy Caldwell / Michelle Hay4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Guinto / Eunice Yim vs Kirtine Yang / Christina Blackburn4-6, 2-6
2024-09-08vs OC LLW Heritage Park - Michelle/LyLost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Highsmith / TRAM LY vs Connie Espina / Katie Moore6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Huyen / Christina Bennett vs Bonnie Lee / Rachel Om3-6, 4-6
2024-09-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIndrani Jackson / Rikki Scharnell vs Janet Lin / Olivia Hu4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoppe / TRAM LY vs Sarah Stadfelt / Ariel Lee7-6, 6-3
2024-08-18vs OC LLW Heritage Park - Michelle/LySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoppe / TRAM LY vs Katie Moore / Emily Wu6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRikki Scharnell / Indrani Jackson vs Rachel Om / Fatima Saqib3-6, 5-7
2024-08-11Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoppe / TRAM LY vs Amy Caldwell / Madison Crawford7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRachel Tran / Katie Huyen vs Huma Khan / Fatima Saqib2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesTRAM LY / Karen Trinh vs Amy Caldwell / Katie Moore5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Chang / Tricia Guinto vs Kirtine Yang / Christina Blackburn6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRikki Scharnell / Christina Bennett vs Bonnie Lee / Erin Kelley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women- 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Karen Trinh
published
4.57
Farrah Northcott
published
4.52
Kristina Ebon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.45
Blair Brzeski
published 4.5
4.43
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
4.24
Tricia Guinto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Mina Whitlock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Margaret Chang
published
3.98
Rachel Tran
published
3.95
Katie Huyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Lily Pham
published
3.74
Rikki Scharnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Indrani Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Indrani Jackson + Rikki Scharnell131155% games−2.3% vs expected
Kristina Ebon + Tricia Guinto8362% gamesnot enough data
Kristina Ebon + TRAM LY7165% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Chang + Dana Kim2338% gamesnot enough data
Mina Whitlock + Tricia Guinto123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Trinh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.70
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Blair Brzeski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.37
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Tricia Guinto
124W–84L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Margaret Chang
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Lily Pham
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Christina Bennett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Rikki Scharnell
101W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Indrani Jackson
120W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.