Teams

GHolmes (BCC)

2023 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-01vs LShelton (BCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Christine Hotham vs Dana Libner / Sheri Newman7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathalie Malter / Michelle Silla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-24vs KNovak (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Gaye Holmes vs DeeDee Fanning / Lynne Herrin6-0, 6-1
2023-04-17vs KIrwin (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Nathalie Malter vs Stacy Doline / Angie Wagner6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesSonia Waters / Melodie Ohaus vs Eileen Jones / Leslie Quick7-6, 7-6
2023-04-03vs SConnor (Providence County Club)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Gaye Holmes vs Lori Ash / Kay Porter6-2, 6-1
2023-03-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathalie Malter / Michelle Silla vs Sheryl Smith / Kathleen Goessel6-2, 6-2
2023-03-13vs EClapp (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Sonia Waters vs Victoria Sofarelli / Joanne Miller6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-06vs LShelton (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Gaye Holmes vs Ellen McKane / Dana Libner6-0, 6-0
2023-02-27vs KNovak (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Gaye Holmes vs Becky Hensley / Debbie Ferguson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNathalie Malter / Michelle Silla vs Irene Caldwell / Vicki Greenway6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Sonia Waters
published
3.04
Susan Blackman
published
2.98
Gaye Holmes
published
2.93
Christine Hotham
published 3
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.61
Jean Sharpe
published
2.47
Nathalie Malter
published
2.46
Michelle Silla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Waters
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Susan Blackman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Gaye Holmes
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Christine Hotham
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Jean Sharpe
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Nathalie Malter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Michelle Silla
39W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.