Teams

Brooks

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.0 MEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-12vs SembranoLost 14
L#1 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Jaykumar Jayswal vs Joseph Kalugdan / Nicolei Nasrabadi6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTristan Bradford vs Nick San Juan3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNick Vogenthaler / Benjamin Hanf vs Jonathan Sembrano / David Power6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesWade Linkert vs Walter Truong4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJordan McGowan / John Doe vs Ramces Francisco / Richard Kaung6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-10-31vs SembranoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMax Mlinar / Luciano Patino vs Kresimir Skvorc / Rodolfo Dy6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesWade Linkert vs Walter Truong5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Bobnick / Jaykumar Jayswal vs David Power / Jet Luna6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJordan McGowan / Samuel Eberhart vs Richard Kaung / Joseph Kalugdan0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jaykumar Jayswal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Max Mlinar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Tristan Bradford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Luciano Patino
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Wade Linkert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Nick Vogenthaler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Josh Kasendorf
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Benjamin Hanf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Jordan McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Bobnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Eberhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Bobnick + Nick Vogenthaler5076% games+20.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaykumar Jayswal
34W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Max Mlinar
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Tristan Bradford
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Luciano Patino
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Wade Linkert
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Nick Vogenthaler
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Josh Kasendorf
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Benjamin Hanf
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jordan McGowan
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Mark Bobnick
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Eberhart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.