Teams

Dulin 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Betty Kramer vs Kelly Cope / Katie Shane7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Batts / Dawn Frank vs Miracle Walters / Ginger Ballard3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Michele Shigo vs Mandi Clift / Samantha Price0-6, 4-6
2025-08-28vs Ustach 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Ray / Betty Kramer vs Hannah Higgins / Casey Emmendorfer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Parsons / Debbie Clancy vs Susan Rounsavall / AMANDA ELDER6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Dulin / Hayes Mills vs Kelly Glick / Erin Cockman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKara Ray / Debbie Clancy vs Ginger Ballard / Miracle Walters6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Parsons / Robin Crosier vs Karrah Durham / Rebekah East6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Batts / Hayes Mills vs Samantha Price / Kelly Pryzwansky6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Catherine Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kara Ray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Yvonne Singh
published
3.54
Mary Batts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Debbie Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Julie Messner
published
3.30
Betty Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Gujrati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Michele Shigo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Robin Crosier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Hayes Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Dawn Frank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Amy Dulin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Crosier + Amy Dulin1448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Crosier + Michele Shigo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tanner
40W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Mary Batts
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Debbie Clancy
30W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Julie Messner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Betty Kramer
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Melissa Gujrati
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Michele Shigo
21W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Robin Crosier
17W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Hayes Mills
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dawn Frank
12W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Amy Dulin
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.