Teams

BETC-Doubles Divas-Furumasu

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-08vs NTC-WilsanoWon 21
L#1 DoublesLyna Nguyen / Kenna Canaan vs Anne Corsano / Heidi Sutter1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarie Michigami / Terra Yara vs Maryse Sparks / Gini Bouche6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Vanderburg / Kay Lorrain vs Carolann Castell / Karen Baebler6-0, 6-3
2025-11-07vs NWW-CP-LeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Furumasu / Shana Curran vs Akiko Suzuki / Kerry Levine1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Michigami / Terra Yara vs Arthe Lee / Petra Carl6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKay Lorrain / Julie Vanderburg vs Teresa Morrow / Ping Yeh5-7, 5-7
2025-10-24vs NTC-WilsanoLost 12
L#1 DoublesSachiko Ishihara-Spray / Shana Curran vs Allison Porter / Heidi Sutter1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLyna Nguyen / Kenna Canaan vs Deborah Wilson / Brenda Williams0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Furumasu / Renee Peterson vs Anne Corsano / Carolann Castell7-5, 6-2
2025-10-11vs NWW-CP-LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSachiko Ishihara-Spray / Shana Curran vs Kirsten Barnes / Kerry Levine7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJenny Sia / Terra Yara vs Arthe Lee / Akiko Suzuki6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-03vs NWW-HBSQ-RutterLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurie Furumasu / Sachiko Ishihara-Spray vs Ildi Koves / Nancy Chan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKay Lorrain / Julie Vanderburg vs Keiko Lambuth / Tracey Hsia0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Sia / Liying Hou vs Racquel Johnson / Heather Morrow2-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs NWW-STC-SuverSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSachiko Ishihara-Spray / Laurie Furumasu vs Lisa Black / Wendy Mounger6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Vanderburg / Kay Lorrain vs Nancy Daly / Kira Sorensen6-4, 7-5
2025-09-13vs NWW-HBSQ-RutterWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenna Canaan / Carmen Dolfo-Garrison vs Keiko Lambuth / Junko Sarausad6-3, 6-2
2025-09-06vs NWW-STC-SuverLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarie Michigami / Sachiko Ishihara-Spray vs Liz Suver / Dayna Guizzetti4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLiying Hou / Laurie Furumasu vs Susan Lammers / Molly Hunter4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carmen Dolfo-Garrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Terra Yara
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Marie Michigami
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.15
Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.07
Kenna Canaan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Julie Vanderburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Renee Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
4.04
Kay Lorrain
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Shana Curran
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.99
Laurie Furumasu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.90
Lyna Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.83
Liying Hou
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Jenny Sia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Lorrain + Lyna Nguyen3450% games+5.4% vs expected
Terra Yara + Marie Michigami16360% games+3.7% vs expected
Laurie Furumasu + Lyna Nguyen2349% games−0.2% vs expected
Sachiko Ishihara-Spray + Shana Curran14853% games−1.1% vs expected
Laurie Furumasu + Kay Lorrain91045% games−1.5% vs expected
Sachiko Ishihara-Spray + Terra Yara6750% games−2.3% vs expected
Kay Lorrain + Sachiko Ishihara-Spray3350% games−5.4% vs expected
Liying Hou + Lyna Nguyen2440% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carmen Dolfo-Garrison
46W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Terra Yara
257W–205L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Marie Michigami
146W–102L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Sachiko Ishihara-Spray
181W–155L career · 10 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Kenna Canaan
53W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Julie Vanderburg
38W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Renee Peterson
79W–39L career · 13 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Kay Lorrain
129W–124L career · 9 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Shana Curran
62W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Laurie Furumasu
59W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Lyna Nguyen
123W–120L career · 8 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Liying Hou
73W–87L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Jenny Sia
122W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.