Teams

LRADavis/RRCC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · W 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Aprile / Lori Moon vs April Cook / Andrea Griffin6-1, 6-1
2022-09-25vs LLRAY-JettonWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Tracey Marchitelli vs April Cook / Holly Pasut7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Aprile / Jann Debord vs Suzun McCrary / Sharon Cantey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Jann Debord vs Diane Davis / Nancy Miller5-7, 1-6
2022-09-12vs LLAL-Altamura/PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Marchitelli / Janet Szilagyi vs Lin Altamura / Laura Engel6-4, 6-3
2022-08-29vs LVWeber/WestportLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Edge / Janet Szilagyi vs Diane Davis / Brenda Levy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Aprile / Lori Moon vs Becky Heflin / Leila Riccardelli4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs LLRAY-JettonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Edge / Janet Szilagyi vs Sharon Cantey / Karen Ray7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Aprile / Julli Goodwin vs Debbie Beam / Nancy Zylstra3-6, 2-6
2022-08-22vs LLAL-Altamura/PeninsulaWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Aprile / Julli Goodwin vs Lin Altamura / Ann Modlin7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Sharon Kerns
published
3.63
Cindy Aprile
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.41
Jann Debord
published
3.39
Patricia Sharawy
published
3.37
Lisa Lawrence
published
3.35
Janet Scott
published
3.34
Lori Moon
published
3.23
Karen Edge
published
3.15
Julli Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Tracey Marchitelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julli Goodwin + Karen Edge3247% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Aprile + Janet Szilagyi314 matchesnot enough data
Julli Goodwin + Cindy Aprile123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Sharon Kerns
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Aprile
41W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jann Debord
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Patricia Sharawy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
Lisa Lawrence
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.37
Janet Scott
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Lori Moon
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Karen Edge
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julli Goodwin
71W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tracey Marchitelli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.