Teams

Girls Just Want to Have Fun!

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-29vs Lakewood 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Bailey / Mary Frances Daly vs Linda Blumenreich / Corinne Boisi4-6, 4-6
2023-11-17vs Maryland MadnessLost 01
L#1 DoublesSilvia Dacci / Sally Bailey vs Holly Rasmussen / Denise Weinig0-6, 4-6
2023-10-30vs Arlington CrushersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Lynn Shanahan / Sally Bailey vs Nicholina Ferramosca / Amelia Gay2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Janet Wu
published
3.28
Leanne Bortner
published
3.27
Sally Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Butler
published 3.5
3.16
Sydney Rowan
published
3.14
Regina Bodi
published
3.08
Tiffany Rowan
published
3.03
Gail Kelleher
published
2.80
Saira Malik
published
2.79
Palmer Dorn
published
Heather Gerth
published
Mary Frances Daly
published
Mary Lynn Shanahan
published
Silvia Dacci
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Rowan + Tiffany Rowan3447% games−3.0% vs expected
Mary Lynn Shanahan + Silvia Dacci213 matchesnot enough data
Palmer Dorn + Saira Malik303 matchesnot enough data
Regina Bodi + Leanne Bortner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Wu
41W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
Leanne Bortner
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Sally Bailey
73W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Butler
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sydney Rowan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Regina Bodi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Tiffany Rowan
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Gail Kelleher
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Saira Malik
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Palmer Dorn
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Heather Gerth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Frances Daly
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Lynn Shanahan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Silvia Dacci
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.