Teams

Patriots 9.0

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 9.0 55s

13 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 9.0 55s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Barbara Knaggs
published 4.5
4.36
Marla Gostisha
published
Christie Manning
published 4.5
4.13
Karla Mihm
published
3.88
Cherie Hall
published 4.5
3.87
Shelly Foreman
published
3.84
Sharon Brennan
published
3.83
Staley Gray
published
3.82
Gay Myrick
published 4
3.66
Matilda O'Connor
published
Gayle Kirkpatrick
published
Petra Waterworth
published
Wendy Cogan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Manning + Barbara Knaggs3451% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Hall + Barbara Knaggs5148% gamesnot enough data
Marla Gostisha + Cherie Hall224 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Foreman + Staley Gray134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Brennan + Matilda O'Connor033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Knaggs + Karla Mihm123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barbara Knaggs
43W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
4.37
Marla Gostisha
74W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Christie Manning
52W–41L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Mihm
30W–27L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cherie Hall
25W–40L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.88
Shelly Foreman
56W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Sharon Brennan
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Staley Gray
22W–39L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.83
4
Gay Myrick
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Matilda O'Connor
37W–28L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Gayle Kirkpatrick
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Petra Waterworth
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Cogan
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.