Teams

Spring Winner/UTC - Lookis

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Social Spring · 7.0 W

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-09vs Cypress - ManiboWon 30
W#1 DoublesRegina Lookis / Janet Choisnet vs Karen Fiorillo / Marilyn Kole6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Snow-Martineau / Hilary Cole vs Linda Rodgers / Marcia Disharoon6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiann Cimring / Emma May vs Elaine Kearney / Sara Manibo6-4, 6-4
2025-06-08vs FMRC - HamiltonWon 21
L#1 DoublesRegina Lookis / Alissar Salman vs Rhonda Allen / Leesa Cotton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Choisnet / Hilary Cole vs Deborah Bretton / Julianne Cooper6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSigalit Sphatt / Diann Cimring vs Becky Yance / Joyce Verdi6-2, 6-3
2025-05-20vs Vivante - FaciszewskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesRaquel Teixeira / Diann Cimring vs Colleen Larson / Rose Stivers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRegina Lookis / Elizabeth Gaines vs Barbara Crane / Mae Nelson Stone7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSigalit Sphatt / Sheila Snow-Martineau vs Nan Faciszewski / Barbara Robinson4-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheila Snow-Martineau / Paula Pirruccello vs Nathaly Garcia / Victoria Albons4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Coleman / Elizabeth Gaines vs Gail Hawthorne / Jodee Siriano7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmma May / Raquel Teixeira vs Val Pacenta / Alexandria Dahms6-2, 6-3
2025-04-28vs Cypress - ManiboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRaquel Teixeira / Diann Cimring vs Karen Fiorillo / Marcia Disharoon6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Lookis / Elizabeth Gaines vs Marilyn Kole / Kim Regets6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-21vs FMRC - HamiltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gaines / Raquel Teixeira vs Rhonda Allen / Jami McCormick6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRegina Lookis / Sigalit Sphatt vs Julianne Cooper / Michelle Hamilton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Coleman / Alissar Salman vs Joyce Verdi / Becky Yance6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-14vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHilary Cole / Elizabeth Gaines vs Alexandria Dahms / Sue Savage6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiann Cimring / Betsy Coleman vs Nathaly Garcia / Victoria Albons6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-07vs Vivante - FaciszewskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesRegina Lookis / Elizabeth Gaines vs Rose Stivers / Colleen Larson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Coleman / Sigalit Sphatt vs Margaret Elmore / Jeannine Holway6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheila Snow-Martineau / Alissar Salman vs Nan Faciszewski / Mae Nelson Stone6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Hilary Cole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Emma May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Raquel Teixeira
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Alissar Salman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Diann Cimring
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Betsy Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Janet Choisnet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Regina Lookis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Elizabeth Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paula Pirruccello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Snow-Martineau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sigalit Sphatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Lookis + Elizabeth Gaines2353% gamesnot enough data
Raquel Teixeira + Emma May5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary Cole
18W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Emma May
32W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Raquel Teixeira
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Alissar Salman
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diann Cimring
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Betsy Coleman
2W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Regina Lookis
33W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Gaines
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Paula Pirruccello
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Snow-Martineau
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sigalit Sphatt
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.