Teams

Sh.Roberts18S

2026 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-13vs Sp.Johnson18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesDaniel Grassinger vs William Anderson2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesShawn Murphy vs Spencer Sauter3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJoseph Hollingsworth vs Hanzhang Liu6-3, 6-0
2026-08-06vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrady Sowers vs Marcelo Roschel6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs John-Michael O'Neill6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sh.Roberts18S1142438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Brady Sowers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Daniel Grassinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Nate Wireback
published 3.5
3.69
Will Howell
published
3.64
Sheldon Roberts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Taylor Atherton
published 3.5
3.54
Joseph Hollingsworth
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Shawn Murphy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Atherton + Sheldon Roberts7264% games+9.1% vs expected
Taylor Atherton + Nate Wireback6260% games+6.9% vs expected
Taylor Atherton + Brady Sowers134 matchesnot enough data
Nate Wireback + Will Howell224 matchesnot enough data
Nate Wireback + Sheldon Roberts314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Atherton + Will Howell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brady Sowers
67W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Daniel Grassinger
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Nate Wireback
95W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.70
Will Howell
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Sheldon Roberts
63W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Taylor Atherton
77W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Joseph Hollingsworth
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Shawn Murphy
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.