Teams

CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/M Estanol & R Diamond

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Men 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesJohn Prahl / Joe Voydat vs Kevin Barton / Edwin LIEW-FERGUSON6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Merced vs Todd Anderson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Collins / Martin Buitrago vs Jason Hall / Kim Kim1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Estanol / Craig Ellis vs Todd Tyra / Paul McCoy5-7, 6-7
W#1 DoublesJohn Prahl / Joe Voydat vs Jason Hall / Kim Kim6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRyan Sheppard vs Todd Anderson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Collins / Martin Buitrago vs Bryan Johnson / Paul McCoy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Carrick / Christopher Alcorn vs Mark Ojakian / Mark Mangold6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
John Prahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Martin Buitrago
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Ryan Sheppard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.96
Yul Bongcaras
published
3.92
Joe Voydat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
3.78
Christopher Alcorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
William Carrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Michael Estanol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Craig Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Joseph Barr
published
3.58
Soterios ANAGNOSTOU
published
3.49
Scott Hendrickson
published
3.49
Steven Fain
published
Matthew Merced
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Randy Diamond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Prahl + Joe Voydat8354% games+7.1% vs expected
William Carrick + Craig Ellis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Prahl
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
Martin Buitrago
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Ryan Sheppard
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Yul Bongcaras
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
Joe Voydat
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Siboupha Sirimanotham
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Christopher Alcorn
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
William Carrick
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Michael Estanol
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Craig Ellis
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Joseph Barr
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Soterios ANAGNOSTOU
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Scott Hendrickson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Steven Fain
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Matthew Merced
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Randy Diamond
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.