Teams

Criner

2024 Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-15vs AuBuchon/BladesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoy Toney / Valerie Smith vs Patty Marcanik / Terry Morrison3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSarah England / Karen Ebert Meyer vs Linda Eisenbeis / Susan Kuehnle6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDina Scherrer / Kathy Lord vs Kathy Aubuchon / Maria Blades6-4, 6-3
2024-06-08vs Burkart/RechtlichWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Taysi / Dina Scherrer vs Ellen Mrazek / Kathy Wennemann3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Criner / Florence Streeter vs Michelle Faust / Norma Feldman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Foley / Jane Herder vs Carla Burkart / Sandy Welkener6-2, 6-2
2024-05-21vs AuBuchon/BladesWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Taysi / Jacqueline Buck vs Terry Morrison / Shirley Graham6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Criner / Karen Ebert Meyer vs Sandra Johnson / Linda Eisenbeis6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPam Manuel / Diane Lewis vs Kathy Aubuchon / Susan Kuehnle6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-11vs Burkart/RechtlichWon 21
W#1 DoublesDina Scherrer / Sharon Taysi vs Vicki Goetz / Sandy Welkener6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise Foley / Jane Herder vs Ellen Mrazek / Kathy Wennemann3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSabrina Siyanbola / Joy Toney vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / Norma Feldman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Burkart-Rechtlich/55&Over7.0W6216820191
2Criner62141026200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jane Herder
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Denise Foley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Ebert Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Dina Scherrer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Sharon Taysi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Jacqueline Buck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sarah England
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Sabrina Siyanbola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Pam Manuel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Diane Lewis
published 3
2.75
Barbara Criner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Joy Toney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Florence Streeter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Ray
published
Kathy Lord
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Criner + Denise Foley3248% games+3.9% vs expected
Barbara Criner + Pam Manuel3442% games+3.8% vs expected
Diane Lewis + Pam Manuel3644% games−0.2% vs expected
Barbara Criner + Diane Lewis4937% games−8.1% vs expected
Barbara Criner + Florence Streeter6061% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Criner + Jacqueline Buck2348% gamesnot enough data
Pam Manuel + Jacqueline Buck2346% gamesnot enough data
Pam Manuel + Florence Streeter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Herder
68W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Denise Foley
131W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Karen Ebert Meyer
78W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Dina Scherrer
55W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
Sharon Taysi
69W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Jacqueline Buck
31W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sarah England
13W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sabrina Siyanbola
45W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Pam Manuel
67W–125L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Diane Lewis
78W–135L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Barbara Criner
72W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Joy Toney
59W–118L career · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Florence Streeter
170W–93L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Julie Ray
35W–48L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Lord
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Smith
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.