Teams

Smash Bros

2026 Tri Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-26vs Kelly/StohrWon 10
W#3 DoublesGrant Avery / Andrew Van Roo vs Brian Stohr / Kevin Mulvehill7-6, 6-3
2026-04-19vs ROC: Ad HereLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Chung / Stephen Repass vs Kirill Kobyakov / Kyle Sherry3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Tran / David Vega vs David Gibbons / Scott Seaver7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGrant Avery / Ankur Mody vs Trevor Ritchie / Scott Fairchild6-7, 2-6
2026-03-29vs Kelly/StohrWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnkur Mody / Grant Avery vs Frank Kaduc / Kevin Mulvehill6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-21vs ROC: Ad HereWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Stephen Repass vs Eugene Kobyakov / Kevin Zablonski6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Tran / David Vega vs Scott Seaver / Amit Revankar6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Johnson / Andrew Van Roo vs Trevor Ritchie / Rich Farrell2-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs Empire TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAarne Lees / Daniel Medina vs Jonel Whitcomb / Mitch Linder6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGrant Avery / Ankur Mody vs Steven Buckley / Daniel Maffia6-2, 6-4
2026-03-07vs Kelly/StohrWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Stephen Repass vs Patrick Kelly / William Spencer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Vega / Kurt Meichtry vs John Dedrick / Terry Krocke7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs ROC: Ad HereLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Chung / Gilbert Collins vs Eugene Kobyakov / Kyle Sherry4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Tran / David Vega vs Joseph McClaney / Josh Gingrich6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGrant Avery / Ankur Mody vs Scott Fairchild / Rich Farrell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Empire TennisWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Pranis / David Vega vs Jonel Whitcomb / Daniel Maffia6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMike Johnson / Andrew Van Roo vs Alex Abrams / Steven Buckley6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Aarne Lees
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Stephen Repass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Ashley Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Michael Bupp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Jackson Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Scott Pranis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kurt Meichtry
published
3.49
David Vega
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Grant Avery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Ankur Mody
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Andrew Van Roo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gilbert Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grant Avery + Ankur Mody4257% games+9.0% vs expected
Stephen Repass + Michael Bupp5253% games−0.6% vs expected
Scott Pranis + Kurt Meichtry3247% games−1.0% vs expected
Aarne Lees + Gilbert Collins3349% games−2.8% vs expected
Jackson Tran + Kurt Meichtry4250% gamesnot enough data
David Vega + Jackson Tran404 matchesnot enough data
David Vega + Kurt Meichtry134 matchesnot enough data
Jackson Tran + Aarne Lees303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aarne Lees
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Stephen Repass
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Ashley Chung
37W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Michael Bupp
105W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
Jackson Tran
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Scott Pranis
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kurt Meichtry
21W–41L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
David Vega
27W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Grant Avery
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
3
Ankur Mody
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Andrew Van Roo
3W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Gilbert Collins
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Tran
17W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.