Teams

NNM 2.5W Tanoan - White

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-29vs NNM 2.5W HP - Liu-NorrodLost 03
L#1 DoublesErika Anderson / Megan Fleming vs Karen S Mendenhall / Sonja Rodenz2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaila Raby vs Janet K Needham2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Cake / Anita Grierson vs Marti Revo / Junting Liu-Norrod2-6, 0-6
2024-04-28vs NNM 2.5W VR - DolanWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Megan Fleming vs Anna de Herrera / Stephanie Jaramillo6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cake / Anita Grierson vs Kamie Buddenhagen / Samantha Chang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs NNM 2.5W Lobo - MorckWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Bobee Forrest / Heather Mock6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaila Raby vs Leona Singer2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Fleming / Emily Lucero vs Francine Morris / Maribel Roybal6-3, 6-2
2024-04-16vs NNM 2.5W VR - DolanWon 20
W#1 DoublesFelicia White / Emily Lucero vs Kamie Buddenhagen / Pearl Lucero6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Kelly-Smith vs Lori Ryan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs NNM 2.5W Tanoan - HarrisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Kaila Raby vs Heidi Effmann / Charlotte Ortiz6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Cake / Anita Grierson vs Jill Pitino / Rebecca Pino2-6, 4-6
2024-04-13vs NNM 2.5W HP - Liu-NorrodWon 20
W#1 DoublesFelicia White / Emily Lucero vs Karen S Mendenhall / Janet K Needham6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Kaila Raby vs Marti Revo / Anne Jones3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-07vs NNM/Staveley/18 & Over/2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Susan Smith / Danielle Staveley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Fleming vs Robyn Andres4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFelicia White / Anita Grierson vs Alyssa Mutz / Valeria Contreras6-0, 6-3
2024-03-21vs NNM 2.5W Lobo - MorckLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Emily Lucero vs Kai Fulker / Luz Gonzales6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaila Raby vs Francine Morris6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Michelle Cake vs Jasmin Maestas / Jennie Weese6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-10vs NNM 2.5W Tanoan - HarrisLost 12
W#1 DoublesFelicia White / Julie Hirshfield vs Heidi Effmann / Carolyn Pratt7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesEmily Lucero vs Rebecca Pino3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Megan Fleming vs Charlotte Ortiz / Sabrina Leyba3-6, 4-6
2024-03-04vs NNM/Staveley/18 & Over/2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesFelicia White / Robyn Leland vs Danielle Kuna / Danielle Staveley3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Hirshfield vs Allysa Gambarella1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErika Anderson / Emily Lucero vs Megan Davison / Alyssa Mutz6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Lucero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Anita Grierson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Julie Kelly-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.25
Felicia White
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
2.25
Megan Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.20
Julie Hirshfield
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.20
Michelle Cake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kaila Raby
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Robyn Leland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia White + Julie Hirshfield5259% games+11.4% vs expected
Anita Grierson + Michelle Cake3248% games−7.4% vs expected
Julie Kelly-Smith + Megan Fleming2347% gamesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Megan Fleming0537% gamesnot enough data
Julie Kelly-Smith + Julie Hirshfield314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Kaila Raby314 matchesnot enough data
Megan Fleming + Kaila Raby224 matchesnot enough data
Felicia White + Michelle Cake123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Lucero
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Anita Grierson
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.61
Julie Kelly-Smith
22W–33L career · 10 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Felicia White
37W–64L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Megan Fleming
22W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Julie Hirshfield
30W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
Michelle Cake
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
Kaila Raby
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Leland
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.