Teams

Killer Gerbils 3.0 18+

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-18vs The Unaided MoversWon 20
W#1 SinglesRichie Wang vs Colin Lippy6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPeter Tice / Geo Pertea vs Jeff Barnes / Chris Riehl6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-16vs Ro-Muns 3.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Vilk / Eric Putman vs Tim Munshell / Armando Zamora2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRichie Wang vs Xavier Cha3-6, 5-6
2021-06-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEric Putman vs Jaspreet Singh5-7, 3-5
2021-05-27vs Racquet Scientists 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSean Alewine / Eric Putman vs Dave Sciamarelli / Bill Hartman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Tice / Richie Wang vs Mervin Dennis / Steven Gibau2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Vilk vs Nigel Graham6-1, 6-3
2021-05-23vs Ro-Muns 3.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRichie Wang / Sean Alewine vs James Albert / Surendra Babu3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeo Pertea / Matthew Vilk vs Kevin Ro / Armando Zamora5-7, 2-6
2021-05-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Vilk / Sean Alewine vs Michael Wellen / Jerry Gruber6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRichie Wang vs Jeff Barnes6-1, 7-6
2021-05-11vs Racquet Scientists 3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Geo Pertea vs Mervin Dennis / Steven Gibau7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRichie Wang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-08vs Three Oh MenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGeo Pertea / Matthew Vilk vs Daniel Laczko / Mark Greenlee6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEric Putman vs Michael Grover6-4, 6-1
2021-04-26vs Ro-Muns 3.0 18+Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSean Alewine / Eric Putman vs Blake Munshell / Johnny Hsiung6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRichie Wang vs Armando Zamora3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMOHANPREET GUJRAL / Matthew Vilk vs Peter Hong / Jason Baumann3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Tice / Richard Boales vs Christian Lee / Kevin Ro4-6, 4-6
2021-04-23vs The Unaided MoversWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Sean Alewine vs Mike Licea / Prasun Guha6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMOHANPREET GUJRAL / Matthew Vilk vs Thomas Atkins / Kweku Amoah6-3, 6-1
2021-04-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesEric Putman / Sean Alewine vs Todd Snyder / David Trossman6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMatthew Vilk vs Jaspreet Singh3-6, 5-6
2021-04-03vs Racquet Scientists 3.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesEric Putman / Matthew Vilk vs Andrew Arnold / Bill Hartman4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesRichie Wang vs Dave Sciamarelli6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Sean Alewine
published
3.33
Joseph Kowalczyk
published
3.30
Eric Putman
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
2.92
Rick Hafey
published
2.83
Matthew Vilk
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.81
Richie Wang
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.71
Chris Wertman
published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richie Wang + Peter Tice1532% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Vilk + Eric Putman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Alewine
29W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
Joseph Kowalczyk
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Eric Putman
134W–201L career · 9 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Rick Hafey
21W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Matthew Vilk
59W–74L career · 16 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Richie Wang
71W–107L career · 17 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Chris Wertman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.