Teams

TTC - Heyn

2022 Brevard Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.22 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-06vs Rockledge - LeiterWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Edwards / Trisha Watson vs Suzanne Taylor / Julia Tulloch6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Tee Wells vs Christine Small / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGinger Ballou / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-17vs Kiwi - DraperSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Beverly Gibbs vs Dana Pederson / Tracy Famiano6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Trisha Watson vs Leesa Brambach / Yvonne Salvatore1-6, 5-7
2022-11-16vs Rockledge - LeiterWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Trisha Watson vs Beth Sidor / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTeresa Blair / Beverly Gibbs vs Julia Tulloch / Xu Sue Huang6-1, 6-4
2022-11-02vs Brevard - RCCB/BartoLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Trisha Watson vs Sara Hatfield / Mary Jo Pecoraro2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTee Wells / Sandra Edwards vs Amy McIntosh / Carol Whalen6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Moorhead / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs Patty Sellers / Arletha White4-6, 2-6
2022-10-19vs Kiwi - DraperLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Tee Wells vs Anne Ramsey / Karin Harnden7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Blair / Janis Mena vs Leesa Brambach / Tracey Draper7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Ginger Ballou vs Betty Schaub / Dana Pederson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-14vs Kiwi - DraperWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Tee Wells vs Barbara Decesari / Betty Schaub6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Beverly Gibbs vs Tracy Famiano / Dana Pederson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-12vs Brevard - RCCB/BartoWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Teresa Blair vs Cynthia Simmons / Mary Jo Pecoraro4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Nancy Aumuller vs Anne Barto / Amy McIntosh6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Heyn / Allison Moorhead vs Patty Sellers / Arletha White4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-05vs Rockledge - LeiterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Trisha Watson vs Julia Tulloch / Xu Sue Huang4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTee Wells / Teresa Blair vs Christine Small / Suzanne Taylor6-2, 6-1
2022-09-21vs Brevard - RCCB/BartoLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Aumuller / Trisha Watson vs Arletha White / Sara Hatfield2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Tee Wells vs Cynthia Simmons / Susan Wilkes0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGinger Ballou / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs Dottie Sorrick / Anne Barto1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Michele Heyn
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Gena Wools
published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
3.06
Janis Mena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Beverly Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.89
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Allison Moorhead
published 3
Ginger Ballou
published 3
Susan Deschaine
published
Teresa Blair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Tee Wells5554% games−2.1% vs expected
Michele Heyn + Gena Wools1636% gamesnot enough data
Janis Mena + Lynne Schettino-DeFelice1436% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Gibbs + Teresa Blair4162% gamesnot enough data
Michele Heyn + Lynne Schettino-DeFelice2348% gamesnot enough data
Michele Heyn + Teresa Blair134 matchesnot enough data
Trisha Watson + Tee Wells134 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Blair + Trisha Watson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gena Wools
29W–60L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
63W–154L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Allison Moorhead
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ginger Ballou
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Deschaine
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Blair
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.