Teams

LIANG - Just For Fun

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 8 9:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
Sep 12 6:00 PM
Lakewood Country Club
Sep 27 6:00 PM
Lakewood Country Club
2026-08-23vs Randle - RUTHLESS RacketLost 03
L#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Randy Lee1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKen Yang vs Saurabh Mahajan1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesWei Fu vs Andrew Lutas4-6, 4-6
2026-08-13vs Iancu - Single ShotsLost 02
L#2 SinglesKen Yang vs Alex Podpaly3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesBo Liang vs Maury Baskin2-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs ChenLost 12
W#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Zhuo Yang2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJumin Park vs Di Tang4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHyun Soo Kim vs Boming Zhang2-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs Kim - RPMLost 02
L#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Peter Zhu1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKen Yang vs Kameron Hnath4-6, 3-6
2026-07-27vs Randle - RUTHLESS RacketLost 03
L#1 SinglesBo Liang vs Jonathan Marcus4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHyun Soo Kim vs Christopher Moroz0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKen Yang vs Randy Lee2-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs Randle - RUTHLESS RacketLost 02
L#2 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Jatin Chhabra0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMark Tyler vs Andrew Lutas6-7, 5-7
2026-07-07vs ChenLost 12
L#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Junyi Shi3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKen Yang vs Xiangbin Zeng6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesHyun Soo Kim vs Di Tang3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Randle - RUTHLESS Racket6218615168
2Chen43111024192
3Iancu - Single Shots327816144
4Kim - RPM3310817148
5LIANG - Just For Fun0621632206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Bryan Bassig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Mark Tyler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.96
Wei Fu
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Bo Liang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.80
Hyun Soo Kim
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.79
Ken Yang
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.77
Jumin Park
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Timothy Murphy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Bassig
142W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Wei Fu
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Hyun Soo Kim
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Ken Yang
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Jumin Park
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Timothy Murphy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.