Teams

Court Queens

Combo · 3.0 Women Shore Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-24vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Suzanne Donlan vs Sharon Coleman / Lisa Prevette7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / linda noto vs Francesca Matassa / Alexandra Pires6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Laura Turek vs Gail Gordon / Candyce Sullivan6-4, 7-5
2026-03-17vs Racquet RebelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDARLENE DER / Sandy Hsyu vs Kristin Lunanuova / Lisa Prevette6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Laura Turek vs Diana Russillo / Jocelyn Carney6-3, 6-4
2026-03-10vs Racquet RebelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / linda noto vs Sharon Coleman / Alexandra Pires4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Susan Lucchesi vs Lisa Prevette / Diana Russillo7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-03vs Racquet RebelsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Donlan / Sandy Hsyu vs Francesca Matassa / Dawn Staniforth6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Susan Lucchesi vs Alexandra Pires / Diana Russillo6-7, 4-6
2026-02-24vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDARLENE DER / Viet Nguyen vs Melissa Federico / Diana Russillo6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Turek / Jacqueline Mason vs Ellen Mccabe / Gail Gordon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErica Sprague / linda noto vs Jocelyn Carney / Marcia Anderson6-3, 6-2
2026-02-17vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Deborah Muschio vs Kristin Lunanuova / Alexandra Pires0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Donlan / DARLENE DER vs Sharon Coleman / Dawn Staniforth6-4, 6-5
W#3 Doubleslinda noto / Erica Sprague vs Jill Pesciotta / Marcia Anderson6-0, 6-1
2026-02-10vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesViet Nguyen / Laura Turek vs Jocelyn Carney / Kristin Lunanuova4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / linda noto vs Gail Gordon / Jessica Valvo7-6, 5-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Mangini-harold / DARLENE DER vs Sharon Coleman / Candyce Sullivan6-4, 6-1
2026-02-03vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Susan Burgess vs Sharon Coleman / Candyce Sullivan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErica Sprague / DARLENE DER vs Dawn Staniforth / Gail Gordon6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Andrea Mangini-harold vs Jocelyn Carney / Ellen Mccabe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-27vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / Andrea Mangini-harold vs Jocelyn Carney / Kristin Lunanuova3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Muschio / Laura Turek vs Lisa Prevette / Jill Pesciotta6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Susan Burgess vs Melissa Federico / Dawn Staniforth6-1, 6-2
2026-01-20vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Susan Burgess vs Kristin Lunanuova / Jocelyn Carney0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 Doubleslinda noto / Andrea Mangini-harold vs Dawn Staniforth / Marcia Anderson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Hsyu / Deborah Muschio vs Sharon Coleman / Marianne Murphy6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Shore Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
DARLENE DER
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
linda noto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Sandy Hsyu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Susan Lucchesi
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.33
Patricia Anne Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Laura Turek
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.30
Jacqueline Mason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Suzanne Donlan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Erica Sprague
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

linda noto + Patricia Anne Lucas8852% games+6.1% vs expected
Susan Lucchesi + Laura Turek3448% games+5.1% vs expected
linda noto + Susan Lucchesi033 matchesnot enough data
linda noto + Laura Turek213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Lucchesi + Jacqueline Mason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DARLENE DER
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
linda noto
14W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Sandy Hsyu
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Susan Lucchesi
12W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Patricia Anne Lucas
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Laura Turek
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Jacqueline Mason
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Suzanne Donlan
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Erica Sprague
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.