Teams

UPTA55A/Gorry/Spindle Tree

2026 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Women - 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-15vs UPTA (A) 3.0W 55 & Over (Golden)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Janie Shipley vs Carol Fauble / Trish Scott6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Kortenber / Linda Gorry vs Deborah B Bowyer / Kelley Golden4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Fiorini / Carol Reifenberger vs Chimene Evans / Michele Davenport1-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs UPTA55A/Brooks/Keowee KeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Jane Kortenber vs Cynthia Fisher / Eileen Simollardes6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanie Shipley / Mary Fiorini vs Nancy Lenkowski / Kaleen Dixon6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Boland / Carol Reifenberger vs Denise Aylor / Vicki Tougaw1-6, 3-6
2026-04-01vs UPTA55A/Kimbell/ThornbladeLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Janie Shipley vs Kelli Reinstein / Karen Golden7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Kortenber / Carol Reifenberger vs Amy Rogers / Amy Cupples0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Gorry / Mary Fiorini vs Shelley Mckay / Carrie Dickert2-6, 1-6
2026-03-25vs UPTA55A/Lawson/HollyTreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Janie Shipley vs Kathleen Fox / Diane Zeager6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarsha Moorhead / Carol Reifenberger vs Tarah M Smith / Susan San Francisco4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Anne Faber / Kelly Boland vs Nancy Baughman / Madina Cauthen1-6, 4-6
2026-03-19vs UPTA55A/Queen/Keowee KeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Jane Kortenber vs Marla Queen / Susan Kremer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Fiorini / Carol Reifenberger vs Cindy Register / Kathryn O'Connor4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLee Anne Faber / Marsha Moorhead vs Katrina Prala / Teresa Baxter1-6, 0-6
2026-03-11vs UPTA55A/Riley/GCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Rickenbaker / Janie Shipley vs Jeanne Robinson / Rhonda Riley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Kortenber / Carol Reifenberger vs Jane Schipper / Stacy Alexandrou1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Boland / Sue Hern vs Virginia Sherman / Stacey Bradshaw1-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs UPTA55A/Michalovsky/ReserveLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeg Sheffield / Cynthia Rickenbaker vs Michele Evanski / Kathy Mendel6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Reifenberger / Jane Kortenber vs Candice Limousin / Kay King5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarsha Moorhead / Linda Gorry vs Mary McCarthy / Debra Michalovsky6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 55+ Adult Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 3.0W 55 & Over (Golden)6116515169
2UPTA55A/Kimbell/Thornblade5212920152
3UPTA55A/Lawson/HollyTree4312922196
4UPTA55A/Riley/GCC43111025184
5UPTA55A/Queen/Keowee Key43101125202
6UPTA55A/Brooks/Keowee Key34111024197
7UPTA55A/Gorry/Spindle Tree0761533222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Cynthia Rickenbaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Meg Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Janie Shipley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Mary Fiorini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Marsha Moorhead
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Jane Kortenber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Linda Gorry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Lee Anne Faber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Carol Reifenberger
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.18
Kelly Boland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Hern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janie Shipley + Cynthia Rickenbaker4253% games−0.7% vs expected
Carol Reifenberger + Jane Kortenber044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Rickenbaker
13W–5L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Meg Sheffield
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Janie Shipley
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Mary Fiorini
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Marsha Moorhead
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.56
Jane Kortenber
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Linda Gorry
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Lee Anne Faber
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.35
3
Carol Reifenberger
3W–15L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
Kelly Boland
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.18
Sue Hern
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.