Teams

A Touch of Gray

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-07-07vs scape GoatsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSherry Huber / Gini Rosandick vs Pamela Wear / Valencia Bilyeu7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJill Call / Deanna McMahon vs Cary Wilson / Stacey Novak6-4, 6-3
2021-07-05vs Racq PacqWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Call / Sherry Huber vs Maureen Sykes / Katie Limani6-0, 6-1
2021-06-16vs Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesGini Rosandick / Jill Call vs Michele Inghram / Dana Rusin6-2, 6-1
2021-06-14vs No Drama MamasLost 01
L#1 DoublesEva VanCuren / Deanna McMahon vs Roxy Therrien / Cecelia Larson4-6, 6-7
2021-06-11vs No Drama MamasWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnette Durham / Sherry Huber vs Tracey Laursen-Idoeta / Linda Bloomer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-09vs Smash SistersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Call / Sherry Huber vs Mary Adcox / Julie Eisele6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGini Rosandick / Adrianne Fisher vs Kristen Jacobs / Dawn Crochet2-6, 1-6
2021-06-04vs YOUNG AGAINWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarnie Newton / Jill Call vs Sharon Young / Loria Sylvia6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEva VanCuren / Deanna McMahon vs Treva Pline / Patricia Aarestad6-2, 6-0
2021-06-02vs YOUNG AGAINWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Call / Sherry Huber vs Treva Pline / Phyllis Cox6-1, 6-1
2021-05-26vs Good GetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGini Rosandick / Elaine Remley vs Kristina LaFace / Lynda Brown3-6, 5-7
2021-05-24vs scape GoatsWon 20
W#1 DoublesGini Rosandick / Adrianne Fisher vs Terri Schwanz / Donna Moussalli6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Adams / Deanna McMahon vs Pamela Wear / Valencia Bilyeu7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A Touch of Gray9125515185
2Smash Sisters9123724236
3Racq Pacq55151533280
4No Drama Mamas55161433270
5YOUNG AGAIN37111941302
6scape Goats37102044292
7Good Gets2872349331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Cathy Adams
published 3.5
3.25
Annette Durham
published 3.5
Carole Wolff
published 3.5
Gini Rosandick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.23
Adrianne Fisher
published 3.5
3.22
Eva VanCuren
published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Remley
published 3.5
Deanna McMahon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jill Call
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sherry Huber
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Remley + Annette Durham6355% games+6.9% vs expected
Eva VanCuren + Cathy Adams8853% games−1.6% vs expected
Cathy Adams + Sherry Huber18855% gamesnot enough data
Gini Rosandick + Adrianne Fisher101246% gamesnot enough data
Gini Rosandick + Marnie Newton41040% gamesnot enough data
Adrianne Fisher + Marnie Newton8455% gamesnot enough data
Jill Call + Sherry Huber7264% gamesnot enough data
Gini Rosandick + Elaine Remley2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Adams
72W–63L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Annette Durham
47W–37L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carole Wolff
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gini Rosandick
39W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Adrianne Fisher
85W–73L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Eva VanCuren
40W–43L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elaine Remley
56W–51L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
Deanna McMahon
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Call
40W–17L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Huber
69W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.