← Teams

SHC-Macdonald/Welter

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Linda Graham
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Ruth Semon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Linda Mertz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Rebecca Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Monica Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Salisbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Nancy Kane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-11-12Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Ruth Semon vs Kathy Ramsey / Paula Conway6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Graham / Jennifer Trank vs Nozomi Bray / Linda Degnan6-4, 6-1
2023-10-29Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRuth Semon / Patricia Eargle vs Della Shanley / Elizabeth Burns6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJennifer Trank / Nancy Kane vs Kristin Campbell / Caroline Hall6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Mary Beth Thomsen vs Wendy Hill / Nicolle Lochner6-3, 7-5
2023-10-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRobin Welter / Chris van Leeuwen vs Nancy Osborne / Robbi Matarrese6-0, 3-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Graham / Jennifer Trank vs Molly Walton / Susan Browning7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Monica Christensen vs Judy Orlandini / Jayne Mitchell6-4, 6-0
2023-10-15Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRobin Welter / Chris van Leeuwen vs Donna Baxter / Alana Rhea6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Monica Christensen vs Cheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRebecca Harris / Nancy Kane vs Ramona Kirsch / Tammy Kitterman6-3, 6-2
2023-10-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRuth Semon / Monica Christensen vs Catherine Greenblatt / Jing Feng6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Chris van Leeuwen vs Laura Shier / Jeny Joseph6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Patricia Eargle vs Elise D Harvey / Sarah Robertson6-2, 6-3
2023-09-30Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBetty Trubo / Ruth Semon vs Shirley Derby / Cecile Bamer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Trank / Linda Graham vs Tuni Stecker / Karen Walker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Robin Welter vs Judith Brauer / Donna Weyand6-1, 6-0
2023-09-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Chris van Leeuwen vs Peggy Jaques / Laura Laney6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Ruth Semon vs Alison Davis / Catherine Leedy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Monica Christensen vs Gail Bolte / Heather MacPherson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Thomsen / Linda Mertz vs Nancy Collins / Wendy Nakatani6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Nancy Salisbury vs Caryn Cohen / Emily Qi6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50
3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rebecca Harris
8W–16L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Monica Christensen
27W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.14
3
Nancy Salisbury
58W–46L career
0%82%18%
2.98
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Nancy Kane
15W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.