Teams

DCC LOPEZ

2026 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Ladies · Thursday Ladies 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-26vs STC MILLERWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Natasha Chevalier / Lauri Horton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Butler vs Malavika Nambiar7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Lapointe / Shana Lopez vs Ashley Miller / Lana Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Thompson / Michelle Andrus vs Irene Chen / Amanda Supple6-2, 6-3
2026-02-19vs SOAKS EDDINSWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Pamela Williams / Edith Alvarez6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Eumarely Wade7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly McAnally / Cheryl Listi vs Jennifer Cottraux / Angie Eddins6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Andrus / Sharon Thompson vs Misha Pfaff / Karen Brown6-1, 6-4
2026-02-06vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 13
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Paula Alexander / Sona Elliott6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Michala Christianson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Andrus / Jennifer Burns vs Carrie McDaniel / Sherry McIlvaine5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Listi / Sharon Thompson vs Nancy Lumbra / Kelly Rait6-7, 2-6
2026-02-05vs BIR FERRELLLost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica Hughes / Kristin Stork vs Heidi Ferrell / Kari Fox2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Brandy Oetman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Butler / Andra Nelson vs Preeti Rangee / Laura Church5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Andrus / Sharon Thompson vs Abbie Aubrey / Elizabeth Wosman6-4, 6-2
2026-01-22vs STC MILLERWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Natasha Chevalier / Nicole DeSensi - Willis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Amber Hupp4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Lapointe / Barbara Shlesinger vs Irene Chen / Jennifer Kelly3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndra Nelson / Rebecca Butler vs Mahtab Abghari / Stephanie Abiodun6-3, 6-3
2026-01-15vs SOAKS EDDINSWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Jennifer Cottraux / Eumarely Wade6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Miriah Schneider6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Butler / Andra Nelson vs Leslie Jones / Jenny Luningham4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Andrus / Barbara Shlesinger vs Dana Rosenstein / Susan Cole6-3, 6-1
2025-12-18vs BIR FERRELLWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Linda Lapointe vs Kari Fox / Vivian Hoff6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Butler vs Samantha Dubeck6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGena Edwards / Jennifer Burns vs Heidi Ferrell / Preeti Rangee4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Shlesinger / Andra Nelson vs Elizabeth Wosman / Erica Hasley7-6, 6-4
2025-12-11vs WAG ALEXANDERWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Stork / Jessica Hughes vs Nancy Lumbra / Kelly Rait6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShana Lopez vs Michala Christianson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Lapointe / Cheryl Listi vs Camille Hand / Michelle Woods6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGena Edwards / Barbara Shlesinger vs Shelby Willborn / Paula Alexander6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Thursday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Shana Lopez
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.00
Linda Lapointe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Michelle Andrus
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Rebecca Butler
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Kristin Stork
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Barbara Shlesinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Cheryl Listi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Kimberly McAnally
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Gena Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Jennifer Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lapointe + Kristin Stork2351% games−7.4% vs expected
Jennifer Burns + Gena Edwards0527% games−16.2% vs expected
Jennifer Burns + Michelle Andrus213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lapointe + Cheryl Listi303 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Listi + Kristin Stork303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shana Lopez
22W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Linda Lapointe
50W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michelle Andrus
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Rebecca Butler
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Kristin Stork
26W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Barbara Shlesinger
14W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cheryl Listi
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
Kimberly McAnally
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Gena Edwards
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jennifer Burns
41W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.