Teams

GLVR-Oglesby/Glenn

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Leigh Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Leslie Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.85
Emily McBride
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Suzie Glenn
published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Andrea Hobi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Won 21
W#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Leslie Lynch vs Liz DelPlato / Cathryn Hansen6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Katherine Kralj / Elda Nelson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Devencenzi vs Marie Picard / Donna Roisom6-0, 6-3
2024-06-22Split 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anderson / Leslie Lynch vs Molly Odonnell / Valyrie Ingram5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Molly Shum / Teresa Sullivan6-3, 7-6
2024-06-09Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Anderson / Leslie Lynch vs Edwardeen Hilts / Judi Babcock6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Karen McNairy / Alena Lauritsen6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTami Oglesby / Cindy Rushall vs Joan Major / Monica Rivares6-3, 6-4
2024-06-01Won 20
W#2 DoublesLeigh Anderson / Michelle Jobe vs Ariana White / Morgan Cowling6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Erin Casey / Nina Hanson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Linda Barr / Tina Clancy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jobe / Cindy Rushall vs Susan Agee / Terri Bashkingy6-3, 6-2
2024-05-05Won 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lynch / Leigh Anderson vs Laura Luthi / Claire Bell6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Sheila Anderson / Heidi Wilcox6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Cindy Rushall vs Michaela Bancud / Terri Pickard7-5, 6-1
2024-04-20Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lynch / Tami Oglesby vs Beth Steffes / Julie Hanson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hobi vs Leonor Diaz del Castillo6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeigh Anderson / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Suzanne Boss / Sharon Kim-Geib5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-14Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Valyrie Ingram / Teresa Sullivan6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hobi vs Molly Shum2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Leslie Lynch vs Kristie Leake / Mary Marsh6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Leigh Anderson vs Aleli Siruno / Erin Davis6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Leigh Anderson
54W–22L career
0%95%6%
3.91
4
Leslie Lynch
58W–58L career
0%97%3%
3.86
4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Suzie Glenn
47W–28L career
not enough data
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.