Teams

Alciatore/40 /3.0/NOD/CP

2025 NO Adult 40 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-11vs Hughs/40/3.0/NOD/NOLTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristy Gentry / Catherine Lim vs Anne Hughs / Amanda Berger3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKallen Forster vs Carli Simpson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBurke McFerrin / Kelsi Schmitz vs Marcela Seerman / Emily Kupperman6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarcella Perino / Judy Kang vs Amanda Winstead / Adrienne Duncan2-6, 5-7
2025-03-13vs NanceEaton/40/3.0/NOD/MCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelsi Schmitz / Kristy Gentry vs Ashley Gootee / Kathryn Broussard7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBurke McFerrin vs Marion Weinstock6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJudy Kang / Kristen Klamer vs Lori Rabito / Meghan Coleman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarcella Perino / Catherine Lim vs Bridget Senner / Katie Newman2-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Maia/England/40/3.0/NOD/CPWon 40
W#1 DoublesKallen Forster / Catherine Lim vs Melissa Maia / Lauren England6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeslie McMichael vs Michelle Buras6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi Dugan / Kristen Klamer vs Kristen Singer / Michele Norris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Reardon / Burke McFerrin vs Christine Bonnet / Danielle Leger6-2, 6-3
2025-02-11vs Oreck/40/3.0/NOD/CPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelsi Schmitz / Heidi Dugan vs Harriet Landrieu / Linda Flynn-Wilson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeslie McMichael vs Elizabeth Charvat1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristy Gentry / Catherine Lim vs JAN COTAYA / Rita Lang6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesArrie Henderson / Burke McFerrin vs Julie Oreck / Julianne Leblanc6-0, 6-0
2025-02-04vs Norris/Giacone/40/3.0/NOD/GAWon 40
W#1 DoublesBurke McFerrin / Kristy Gentry vs Janine LeBlanc Walsdorf / Ellen Plaisance6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeslie McMichael vs Vanessa Gehring6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Billeaudeau / Catherine Lim vs Michelle Heidingsfelder / Connie Wise6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Klamer / Arrie Henderson vs Sandra Huston / Amy Blanke7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kallen Forster
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Leslie McMichael
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Burke McFerrin
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristy Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.09
Heidi Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Catherine Lim
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.05
Kelsi Schmitz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.04
Marcella Perino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kristen Klamer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Arrie Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Sara Reardon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Kang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Billeaudeau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Gentry + Catherine Lim224 matchesnot enough data
Kallen Forster + Burke McFerrin404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Billeaudeau + Catherine Lim213 matchesnot enough data
Kelsi Schmitz + Catherine Lim123 matchesnot enough data
Kelsi Schmitz + Burke McFerrin213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Kang + Kristen Klamer123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Kang + Marcella Perino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kallen Forster
83W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
Leslie McMichael
64W–34L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Burke McFerrin
77W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kristy Gentry
25W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Heidi Dugan
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Catherine Lim
51W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kelsi Schmitz
24W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Marcella Perino
53W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Kristen Klamer
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Arrie Henderson
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sara Reardon
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Judy Kang
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Billeaudeau
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.