Teams

LSSchneider/NMP

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2022-10-17vs LKPowell/WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Sayra Brynn vs Kristen Rogers / Pam Barbagli7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Pippin / Martine Maness vs Dana Andrews / Stacy Beardslee3-6, 1-6
2022-10-10vs LMRobinson/WestportLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Shaw / Natalie Hallman vs Zahra Simonetti / DIANE FIORE4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Rester / Amy Barnett vs Astrid Peterson / Nancy Hibsch4-6, 4-6
2022-10-03vs LLHissom/LNTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Pippin / Leslie Shaw vs Deedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartine Maness / Natalie Hallman vs Patricia Bochey / Elizabeth Davis6-3, 7-6
2022-10-02vs LGEarnshaw/SkybrookLost 01
L#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Lisa Levy vs Kristen Frame / Odette Baker6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-26vs LKPowell/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Barnett / Sayra Brynn vs Danielle Curwood / Beth Franck6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Church / Kelli Rester vs Meagan Palmer / Pam Barbagli6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Pippin / Samantha Schneider vs Kathleen Stiffler / Carrie Davin3-6, 4-6
2022-09-20vs LTMerklein/NorthstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Lisa Levy vs Kristin Wilson / Kathryn Burdick7-6, 6-1
2022-09-19vs LMRobinson/WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Barnett / Sayra Brynn vs Zahra Simonetti / Laura Gallapis6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMartine Maness / Karen Pippin vs Astrid Peterson / Joanne Empey Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
2022-09-12vs LLHissom/LNTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Barnett / Sayra Brynn vs Lori Hissom / Christine Dacko6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Karen Pippin vs Florence Hardymon / Tina Krohn7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelli Rester / Martine Maness vs Patricia Bochey / Elizabeth Davis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-12vs LHMacFadyen/JettonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLee Bierer / Sylvia Sullivan vs Annette Mootilal / Danielle Fowler3-6, 4-6
2022-09-06vs LLHolmes/ PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Lisa Levy vs Patty Howe / Gayle Larson6-0, 6-3
2022-08-31vs LMRobinson/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Barnett / Sayra Brynn vs Astrid Peterson / Fran Emerzian6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Shaw / Kelli Rester vs Jennifer Johnston / JESSICA WOLTER6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Sanders / Karen Pippin vs Mali Robinson / Nancy Hibsch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-29vs LKPowell/WestportLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Rester / Tina Church vs Danielle Curwood / Dana Andrews5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Schneider / Karen Pippin vs Sheila Chast / Kathleen Stiffler6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGay Thorne / Natalie Hallman vs Kristen Rogers / Pam Barbagli0-6, 3-6
2022-08-23vs LSBE-Beardslee/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Terri DeWilde vs Coleen Foye / Kathleen Stiffler4-6, 2-6
2022-08-20vs LLHissom/LNTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSayra Brynn / Amy Barnett vs Florence Hardymon / Cindy Plua6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSamantha Schneider / Kelli Rester vs Deedee Beem / Cheryl Strouse7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTina Church / Natalie Hallman vs Tina Krohn / Elizabeth Davis7-5, 6-3
2022-08-16vs LKGrathwohl/River RunLost 01
L#3 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Leslie Shaw vs Natalie Van Epps / Susan Cohen6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Amy Barnett
published 3.5
3.25
Sayra Brynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sylvia Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Martine Maness
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Leslie Shaw
published
2.69
Samantha Schneider
published
2.66
Gay Thorne
published 3
2.61
Kelli Rester
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Karen Pippin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.26
Natalie Hallman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Schneider + Martine Maness3446% games−1.4% vs expected
Kelli Rester + Karen Pippin3254% gamesnot enough data
Martine Maness + Karen Pippin2344% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Shaw + Sylvia Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Barnett
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Sayra Brynn
74W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Sylvia Sullivan
106W–59L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Martine Maness
55W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Leslie Shaw
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Samantha Schneider
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Gay Thorne
27W–24L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Kelli Rester
42W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Karen Pippin
68W–108L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Natalie Hallman
57W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.