Teams

LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTC

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs LCTA18/Holena/CreeksideWon 20
W#1 SinglesSamantha Devetski vs Amy Arrington6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKatie Linton vs Aly Sexton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-06vs LCTA 18/Zhang/LTPDILost 02
L#1 SinglesSamantha Devetski vs Madeline Leo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMeaghan McIntyre vs Suzie Zhang0-6, 0-6
2026-05-23vs LCTA18/Murphy/MPRLost 12
L#1 SinglesKelsey Leonard vs Anna Hyland2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMeaghan McIntyre vs Sarah Simmonite0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSara Christopher vs Madeline Simes6-2, 6-4
2026-05-16vs LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St AndrewsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSamantha Devetski vs Caroline Hicks7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKatie Linton vs Laura Joines6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-09vs LCTA18/Chapman/CreeksideLost 02
L#1 SinglesMeagan Riley vs Kate Besta1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Chitty vs Mary Catherine Arthur2-6, 5-7
2026-04-25vs LCTA18/Gaunt/DICWon 21
L#1 SinglesSara Christopher vs Susanna Kopchains3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMeagan Riley vs Jana Upshaw6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesShirley Godfrey-Jackson vs Kat Kuhns6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Samantha Devetski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Sara Christopher
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Nicole Hause
published
3.22
Katie Linton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Kelsey Leonard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Meaghan McIntyre
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Kristen Chitty
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Meagan Riley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.94
Rachel Farmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Godfrey-Jackson + Rachel Farmer314 matchesnot enough data
Kelsey Leonard + Meaghan McIntyre303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Devetski
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sara Christopher
54W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
Nicole Hause
32W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Katie Linton
24W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Kelsey Leonard
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Meaghan McIntyre
51W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Shirley Godfrey-Jackson
116W–101L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kristen Chitty
24W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Meagan Riley
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
Rachel Farmer
73W–56L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.