Teams

Club Continental - Alden

2026 Duval TriLevel 18 & Over Men - Winter · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.55 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-18vs Epping Forest - ScherrWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Alden / Elias Derke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBilly Hutchinson II / Kyle Whalen vs Tyler Scherr / Malcolm Jones6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesReed Hawkins / Emmett Glasgow vs Michael Greene / John Weedon6-1, 6-1
2026-03-11vs Baymeadows - GordonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Paul Vergara vs Erwin Renan Daclan / Noah Masters6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-04vs Deerwood - ForbesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Craig Gambardella vs Scott Aull / H Bryan Neel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBilly Hutchinson II / Kyle Whalen vs Georgi Kirov / Brad Slappey6-2, 6-2
2026-02-18vs Plantation - CunninghamWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Elias Derke vs Josh Ezring / Eric Gray6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEddie Kiep / Jay Westercamp vs John Hanlon / Carlos Muniz6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGarth Biggar / Emmett Glasgow vs Tim Baird / Tripp Morris6-2, 6-2
2026-02-11vs Epping Forest - ScherrWon 30
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Michael Alden vs Erik Berger / Rob DeJesus6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEddie Kiep / Kyle Whalen vs Joseph Lentz / Brian Smith6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmmett Glasgow / Reed Hawkins vs Tyler Scherr / David Wood6-2, 6-1
2026-02-09vs Plantation - CunninghamWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Vergara / Troy Patton vs Josh Ezring / Eric Gray2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJay Westercamp / Kyle Whalen vs Richard Cunningham / Christopher Gregory6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGarth Biggar / Reed Hawkins vs Brian Leschinski / Don Zahnle6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-04vs Baymeadows - GordonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Paul Vergara vs Noah Masters / Oscar Villanueva6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBart McClure / Emmett Glasgow vs Vladimir Kleynburg / Ahmad Drshen6-3, 7-5
2026-01-28vs Deerwood - ForbesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCraig Gambardella / Troy Patton vs Scott Aull / H Bryan Neel7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Kyle Whalen vs Sean Joyce / Georgi Kirov3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Paul Vergara
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.85
Elias Derke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Andrew de Jong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Craig Gambardella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Troy Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Alden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Jay Westercamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Billy Hutchinson II
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.55
Dan Calvo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Eddie Kiep
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Emmett Glasgow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Kyle Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
John Comiskey
published
3.07
Reed Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Garth Biggar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Bart McClure
published 3
Parker Touchton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garth Biggar + Bart McClure4251% games−2.9% vs expected
Kyle Whalen + Paul Vergara9455% games−4.0% vs expected
Kyle Whalen + Billy Hutchinson II6258% gamesnot enough data
Emmett Glasgow + Billy Hutchinson II5062% gamesnot enough data
Paul Vergara + Elias Derke213 matchesnot enough data
John Comiskey + Jay Westercamp213 matchesnot enough data
Dan Calvo + Billy Hutchinson II303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Vergara
96W–71L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Elias Derke
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Andrew de Jong
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Craig Gambardella
59W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Troy Patton
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Alden
13W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jay Westercamp
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Billy Hutchinson II
29W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Dan Calvo
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Eddie Kiep
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Emmett Glasgow
16W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Kyle Whalen
110W–98L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
John Comiskey
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Reed Hawkins
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Garth Biggar
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Bart McClure
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Parker Touchton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.