Teams

Hillman - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-03vs Escambia - SHL/FuentealbaLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / John Whittenberger vs MICHAEL SEUZENEAU / Marco Fuentealba4-6, 1-6
2022-04-19vs Esmonde - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Stewart / John Wimberly vs Scott Aspinwall / Ethan Rhone6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Whittenberger / George Rials vs Douglas Lurton / Jeffrey Powell6-2, 6-4
2022-04-12vs Escambia - SHL/FuentealbaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Mark Downey vs Ken McCurdy / Breck Ford6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Glenn Langan vs Timothy Sumrall / Marco Fuentealba7-6, 6-3
2022-03-29vs Esmonde - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Downey / George Rials vs Ethan Rhone / Nick Farkas6-0, 6-1
2022-03-22vs Escambia - SHL/FuentealbaLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Stewart / John Wimberly vs MICHAEL SEUZENEAU / Marco Fuentealba1-6, 5-7
2022-03-08vs Esmonde - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Downey / George Rials vs Kirk Bradley / Scott Aspinwall6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Stewart / John Wimberly vs Jeffrey Powell / Ethan Rhone6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
George Rials
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.34
John Whittenberger
published
3.32
Jonathan Garcia
published
3.22
Andrew Hillman
published 3.5
3.19
Kenneth Wallace
published
3.08
Glenn Langan
published 3.5
2.74
DONALD GREEN
published 3
John Wimberly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Russell Ball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hillman + Eric Stewart2548% games−0.2% vs expected
John Wimberly + George Rials123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
George Rials
95W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Jonathan Garcia
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Kenneth Wallace
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Glenn Langan
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
DONALD GREEN
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Russell Ball
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.