Teams

CP:Topspinners:das Neves

2023 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 3.5 W 3

23 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-02-25vs SOL:Slammers:ClarkeWon 10
W#1 SinglesKathleen DiSalvatore vs Sandra Rose3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-26vs CP:Serve Me A Double:LangloisLost 01
L#2 DoublesShari Matusow / Lisa Boren vs Sara Watts / Sarah Huber1-6, 1-6
2023-01-17vs GCC:Net Crushers:ArrayaWon 10
W#2 DoublesShari Matusow / Lisa Boren vs Susan Carroll / Dawn Israel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-12-02vs GS:Slice Girls:PachecoWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Keefe / Shari Matusow vs Kathleen Finlay / Kelley Lambert6-4, 5-6
W#3 DoublesLillian Pascale / Kathleen DiSalvatore vs Jeanne Golden / Donna Durvasula6-4, 6-4
2022-11-18vs SOL:Slammers:ClarkeWon 10
W#3 DoublesShari Matusow / Lisa Boren vs Sandra Rose / Isabelle Plourde6-3, 6-4
2022-09-22vs WTC:Hot Shots:Borcherding/TardioLost 01
L#1 DoublesShari Matusow / Shannon Smith vs Charlotte Byers / Lourdes Marti6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-18vs CP:Chelsea Tornado:RamanWon 30
W#1 SinglesCecilia McCall vs Ali Campbell6-4, 3-2
W#2 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Nadine Shaoul vs Fern Loeb / Carrie Vomacka6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDorinda Bonanno / Maria Hart vs Mimi Flynn / Malathi Raman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-11vs CP:Serve Me A Double:LangloisWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Hawkins / Nadine Shaoul vs Lisa Geotes / Laurie Hoffman6-7, 5-3
W#2 DoublesValerie Rickens / Stefanie Vitti vs Stacy Louizos / Lisa Comunale6-3, 6-3
2022-01-25vs SOL:Slammers:ClarkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Hagenow / Nadine Shaoul vs Ellen Clarke / Stacy Louizos6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKAREN CHRISTIANSEN / Valerie Rickens vs Shirley Liu / Hedi OConnor6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-21vs NC:Aces:Campo/SimonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNadine Shaoul / Michi Tremonte vs Jenny West D'Alba / Meghan Scanlan6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDorinda Bonanno / Maria Hart vs Amanda Bergen / Susan Hartong6-1, 6-3
2021-10-15vs CP:Chelsea Tornado:RamanLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Pon / Lillian Cutaj vs Danielle Muller-Yoo / Elizabeth Boutry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDorinda Bonanno / KAREN CHRISTIANSEN vs Malathi Raman / Alzbeta Harvey5-7, 4-5
2021-09-24vs 4S:Positive Spin:Gaspar/GolanWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Keefe / Shari Matusow vs Amanda Bergen / Heidi Locke Simon6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.5 W 3
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Serve Me A Double:Langlois012331533359
2CP:Serves You Right:Woodruff/Holscott012321434367
3WTC:Hot Shots:Borcherding/Tardio012311538310
4MRC:Love All:Kim/Ratcliffe012271742383
54S:Shore Shots:Margulies/Buono012281743397
64S:Double Trouble:Lodato/Satrazemis012261744404
7NC:Aces:Campo/Simon012251845405
8CP:Topspinners:das Neves012261847418
9KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned012242048393
10GRC:Red:Leon/Auch012252049421
11KH:No Access:Sparagna012242149431
12GRC:Blue:Leon012252250389
13FIT:Queens of the Court:Roper/Genser012242455469
14MRC:Tough Love:Bandak012202860431
15GCC:Net Crushers:Arraya012163167460
16CP:Chelsea Tornado:Raman012153069498
17IA:Down the Wine:Hubbard012103476511
18INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly012113376521
19SOL:Slammers:Clarke01273879518

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Courtney McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4
3.82
Shannon Weber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.72
Lisa Lubart
published
3.72
Amanda Barrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Kathleen DiSalvatore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Stefanie Vitti
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.27
Maria Das Neves
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Shari Matusow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Alisa Mujagic
published 3.5
3.23
Meredith Petitjean
published
3.10
Randa Trivisonno
published
3.10
Cecilia McCall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Lisa Boren
published
2.97
Christine Pon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Rory VanGelder
published
Donna Garvin
published
Dorinda Bonanno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Warrick
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Lillian Pascale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lynne Vaught
published
Nadine Shaoul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Keefe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Rickens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney McKinney + Amanda Barrow11467% games+18.4% vs expected
Stefanie Vitti + Courtney McKinney5162% games+14.8% vs expected
Stefanie Vitti + Kelly Warrick7754% games+7.5% vs expected
Stefanie Vitti + Valerie Rickens9359% games+4.0% vs expected
Stefanie Vitti + Amanda Barrow224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen DiSalvatore + Cecilia McCall314 matchesnot enough data
Maria Das Neves + Shannon Weber213 matchesnot enough data
Stefanie Vitti + Nadine Shaoul213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney McKinney
98W–54L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Shannon Weber
111W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Lisa Lubart
117W–60L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amanda Barrow
55W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Kathleen DiSalvatore
196W–171L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Stefanie Vitti
128W–99L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Maria Das Neves
159W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Shari Matusow
253W–134L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Alisa Mujagic
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Petitjean
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Randa Trivisonno
35W–58L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cecilia McCall
66W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Lisa Boren
75W–50L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christine Pon
102W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.97
Rory VanGelder
30W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Donna Garvin
33W–45L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Dorinda Bonanno
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Warrick
96W–57L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lillian Pascale
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynne Vaught
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nadine Shaoul
77W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Keefe
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Rickens
58W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.