Teams

Valdosta/Tina Folsom

2025 Valdosta Southern Combo 40 & Over - Fall · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-14vs McKey Park - RickertWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Folsom / Meghan Womack vs Sarah Kolisz / Leigh Ann Hogan8-6
W#2 DoublesDana Boruff / Tara Purvis vs Leigh Jordan / Meredith Adams8-4
W#3 DoublesBecky Smith / Michelle Parkerson vs Anne Rickert / Andrea Schruijer8-5
2025-09-13vs McKey Park - RickertWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Folsom / Jennie Alvarez vs Andrea Schruijer / Leigh Jordan8-4
W#2 DoublesDana Boruff / Meghan Womack vs Anne Rickert / Leigh Ann Hogan9-7
W#3 DoublesJulee Lincoln / Michelle Parkerson vs Sarah Kolisz / Meredith Adams8-6
2025-09-06vs McKey Park - RickertWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Folsom / Jennie Alvarez vs Leigh Jordan / Andrea Schruijer8-3
W#2 DoublesJulee Lincoln / Michelle Parkerson vs Anne Rickert / Leigh Ann Hogan9-7
W#3 DoublesBecky Smith / Tara Purvis vs Sarah Kolisz / Meredith Adams8-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Dana Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Tina Folsom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Julee Lincoln
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Meghan Womack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Tara Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jennie Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Parkerson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Womack + Tara Purvis044 matchesnot enough data
Dana Boruff + Tara Purvis123 matchesnot enough data
Dana Boruff + Tina Folsom303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Boruff
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tina Folsom
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Julee Lincoln
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Meghan Womack
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Tara Purvis
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Jennie Alvarez
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Parkerson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.