Teams

Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men 55+ Wed

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs Moore 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesEnno de Vries / Keith Hill vs Bill Watson / Charles Bolton6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuke Rhoten / Kevin Kemp vs Coray Mitchell / Wayne Hamilton6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJohn Middleton / Kevin Roley vs David Patterson / DAREN BARNES6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Vary 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Wells / Luke Rhoten vs Jason Altmann / Todd Hurst2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJack Walsh / Kevin Dover vs John Bradley / Jon Knight5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGerardo Scheufler / Ashley Fuquay vs Peter Novosad / David Grubbs2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men 55+ Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Howard Driggers
published
3.73
Gerardo Scheufler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Enno de Vries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Kevin Dover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Luke Rhoten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Robert Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin Roley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Ashley Fuquay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Jack Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Keith Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kevin Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Eric Carwile
published
John Middleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Wells + Enno de Vries404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Fuquay + Kevin Roley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Howard Driggers
8W–19L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.74
Gerardo Scheufler
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Enno de Vries
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Kevin Dover
45W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Luke Rhoten
49W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Robert Wells
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Kevin Roley
40W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Ashley Fuquay
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jack Walsh
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Keith Hill
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Kevin Kemp
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Eric Carwile
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
John Middleton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.