Teams

BRMST BLACK

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-14vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Knickerbocker / Stephane Billat vs Damon Balfour / Mallory Karr3-6, 1-6
2023-05-07vs TTA-E YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Stephane Billat vs Melissa McGinness / Christopher Stimmel6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-30vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Ann Ipsen vs Rebekah Harvey / Erik Esborg7-5, 7-5
2023-04-23vs NJ GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Bouck / JoJo Brotamonte vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Rick Bonczynski6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Lynn Knickerbocker vs Kris Hansen / Jonathan Hall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-16vs MEA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Ipsen / David Ipsen vs Christine Belin / Don Anderson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoJo Brotamonte / Jill Bouck vs Kristi Elting / Samuel Elting1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
JoJo Brotamonte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Kari Diamond
published
3.29
Rachel Vue
published
3.24
Stephane Billat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Lynn Knickerbocker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Howard Diamond
published
3.13
Ann Ipsen
published 3.5
3.10
Jasper Vue
published
2.90
Glenn Fleckenstein
published
2.71
David Ipsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Bouck
published
Sandy Sutton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephane Billat + Lynn Knickerbocker6749% games−11.1% vs expected
Sandy Sutton + Glenn Fleckenstein0639% gamesnot enough data
Kari Diamond + Howard Diamond314 matchesnot enough data
Jasper Vue + Rachel Vue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JoJo Brotamonte
50W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kari Diamond
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Rachel Vue
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Stephane Billat
98W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Lynn Knickerbocker
113W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Howard Diamond
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ann Ipsen
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Jasper Vue
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Glenn Fleckenstein
5W–21L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
David Ipsen
31W–74L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Jill Bouck
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Sutton
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.