Teams

ACAC-Stephens

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11vs BURK-KampingaWon 10
W#2 DoublesWarren Smigo / Kim Espasadin vs Melissa Allen / Billy Fulwider6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-05vs WO-FordLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Morgan / Karl Jones vs Brian Ford / Sharon Fuller4-6, 4-6
2023-03-04vs WW-ColemanWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Saunier / Warren Smigo vs Leigh Detreville-Long / Carter King7-6, 6-4
2023-02-19vs MAC-SnowLost 01
L#3 DoublesWarren Smigo / Kim Espasadin vs Matthew Morris / Therese Jones6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-01-21vs MAC-WhiteLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarl Jones / Rebecca Morgan vs Terrance Milo / Mary Scott1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-14vs BURK-DeckerLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarl Jones / Rebecca Morgan vs Elizabeth Hughes / Michael Hazelwood2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Bradley Snyder
published 4.5
3.79
Pearl Horng
published
3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.69
Michelle Nelson
published
3.67
Marc Oosterhuis
published
3.67
Warren Smigo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Shari Litow
published
3.60
Steve Hamant
published
3.55
Jonathan Brew
published
3.37
Karl Jones
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Saunier
published 3.5
3.13
Kim Espasadin
published
3.07
Rebecca Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bradley Snyder
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Pearl Horng
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Nelson
12W–24L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Marc Oosterhuis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Warren Smigo
72W–159L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Shari Litow
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Steve Hamant
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jonathan Brew
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Karl Jones
144W–148L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Anne Saunier
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Kim Espasadin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Rebecca Wong
90W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.