Teams

TBixler (Queens)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesBryan Stonestreet vs Kevin Green6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Mathias Schmidt3-6
2026-07-13vs LAyala (Hornets Nest)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Glapiak vs Jared McKiernan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Pete Eakin6-3, 7-5
2026-07-06vs JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBryan Stonestreet vs Jesse Olmstead6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCharlie Reiney vs Adrian Mendoza6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Wilson Pegram6-0, 6-0
2026-06-29vs CGardner (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Diego Gonzalez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Glapiak vs Raj Voleti6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChet Kristy vs Jeremy Chen3-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs JMarks (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Glapiak vs Jim Marks6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChet Kristy vs Brad VanHoy6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Sahil Vasa6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Glapiak vs Shivam Desai7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCharlie Reiney vs Andrew Schulz6-4, 6-3
2026-06-05vs WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 SinglesMatthew Glapiak vs Jason Rickel6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChet Kristy vs Matthew Baum6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Jackson Tiedeman3-6, 6-7
2026-05-18vs LAyala (Hornets Nest)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBryan Stonestreet vs Pete Eakin6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesThomas Bixler vs Jordan Paterra6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChet Kristy vs LUIS AYALA6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBixler (Queens)6218614158
2WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road)6217718170
3LAyala (Hornets Nest)44141025186
4GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park)35101430216
5JOlmstead (Mason Wallace)3561838255
6JMarks (PCC)1751939244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Bryan Stonestreet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.47
Charlie Reiney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Matthew Glapiak
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
4.30
Chet Kristy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Thomas Bixler
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bryan Stonestreet
19W–3L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.55
4.5
Charlie Reiney
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
4.47
Matthew Glapiak
11W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Chet Kristy
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
Thomas Bixler
12W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.