Teams

55 & Over W6.0-Caribbean Montehiedra-Ivy Diaz

Adult 55 & Over 2021 · Adult 55 & Over W6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-05vs 55 & Over W6.0-CTH-Rita GarciaWon 10
W#2 DoublesNorma Rodriguez-Gomez / Carmen Santos vs Elizabeth Melendez / Ivette Jimenez6-2, 6-1
2021-08-28vs 55 & Over W6.0-CTH-Rita GarciaLost 01
L#3 DoublesMargaret Matos / Norma Rodriguez-Gomez vs Rosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-08-25vs 55 & Over W6.0-CTH-Rita GarciaLost 01
L#1 DoublesBegona Tejedor / Norma Rodriguez-Gomez vs Lillian Munoz / Aida Baerga2-6, 2-6
2021-08-22vs 55 & Over W6.0-CTH-Rita GarciaLost 01
L#2 DoublesNorma Rodriguez-Gomez / Nora Capriles vs Rosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Matos / Norma Rodriguez-Gomez vs Sonia Olmeda / CARMEN ARROYO6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Matos / Norma Rodriguez-Gomez vs Myra Acevedo / Wanda DeJesus7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Nilda Calzada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.97
Carmen Naranjo
published 3.5
2.85
Ivy Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.77
Margaret Matos
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Carmen Santos
published 3
2.74
Ena Acevedo
published 3
2.69
Begona Tejedor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.48
Norma Rodriguez-Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.23
Myrna Lopez
published
Nora Capriles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Rodriguez-Gomez + Ena Acevedo5061% games+5.5% vs expected
Myrna Lopez + Carmen Naranjo11851% games−2.6% vs expected
Ivy Diaz + Begona Tejedor8451% games−3.0% vs expected
Norma Rodriguez-Gomez + Margaret Matos5548% gamesnot enough data
Ivy Diaz + Nilda Calzada2442% gamesnot enough data
Begona Tejedor + Ena Acevedo5157% gamesnot enough data
Nilda Calzada + Margaret Matos3250% gamesnot enough data
Norma Rodriguez-Gomez + Nora Capriles033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nilda Calzada
20W–42L career · 8 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carmen Naranjo
33W–36L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Ivy Diaz
95W–65L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Margaret Matos
65W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carmen Santos
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ena Acevedo
28W–30L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Begona Tejedor
54W–34L career · 8 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Norma Rodriguez-Gomez
31W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Dolores Rodriguez
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
2.23
Myrna Lopez
15W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nora Capriles
14W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.