Teams

Duncan

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-17vs Wheeler 4.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Duncan / Susan Homberg vs Lisa Brousseau / Beth Steinberg2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Adams / Rachael Mott vs Stephanie Zorn / Monica Maloney2-6, 4-6
2021-06-09vs Boustany 4.0 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Duncan / Corinna Dragulescu vs Danielle Gourdine / Valerie Hicks7-6, 6-3
2021-06-04vs AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Robinson / Susan Homberg vs Michelyn Boyd / Lonnie Pera6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVicki Williamson / Rachael Mott vs Susan Baxter / Teresa Love6-1, 6-0
2021-05-26vs Wheeler 4.0 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Carroll / Rachael Mott vs Bonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski6-2, 6-2
2021-05-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinna Dragulescu / Jennifer Jackson vs Jacquelyn Berry / Lisa Muller5-7, 3-6
2021-05-13vs Bring'n The SpiceLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Susan Homberg vs Malika Rasheed / Virginia Fung6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Burton / Corinna Dragulescu vs Kerry Spicer / Carolyn Greis0-6, 5-7
2021-04-29vs Boustany 4.0 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Homberg / Karen Robinson vs Nancy Trimble / Gaelle Boustany6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCorinna Dragulescu / Rachael Mott vs Judi Humpert / Lisa Paulman6-4, 6-2
2021-04-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Homberg / Catherine Wheeler vs Karen Hajj / Amy Rye6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-18vs Oaksmith 4.0 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wheeler / Susan Homberg vs Kate Dempsey / Melissa Doupe7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs Bring'n The SpiceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Adams / Rachael Mott vs Virginia Fung / Malika Rasheed0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Robinson / Corinna Dragulescu vs Laura McInerney / Janet Molleur7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
3.71
Robin Burton
published
3.67
Susan Homberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Rachael Mott
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Corinna Dragulescu
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Teresa Adams
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Williamson
44W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
4.38
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Susan Homberg
75W–88L career · 12 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Rachael Mott
89W–126L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Corinna Dragulescu
31W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
Teresa Adams
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.