Teams

Stranix/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-27vs Tramontin/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesColleen Harris / Meredith Schapman vs Lori Breaux / Brianna Mildenhall6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSamantha Harber vs Jeanne Jenkins2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Kienzler / Jennifer Fitzsimmons vs Megan Michaels / Samantha Tramontin2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Esposito vs Ami Simons3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Patten / Jackie Mcshane vs Jennifer Luteran / Liz Norvell2-6, 4-6
2026-04-13vs Bateman/Knight/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMeaghan Stranix / Samantha Harber vs Lauren Weaver / Sarah Enstice1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTaryn Hickey vs Anne Knight6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Esposito / Brooke Christianson vs Traci Gilbert-Stafford / Megan de la O2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Patten vs Kaelin Cramer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Delaney / Beth Hasebroock vs Kelly Myers / Carey Peek0-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs Bacon/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesMeaghan Stranix / Samantha Harber vs Karen Wolfson / Alex Samuels1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Schapman vs Paige Bacon0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Patten / Taryn Hickey vs Candice Hall / Emily Bryan4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Hasebroock vs Shelby Murphy0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Delaney / Jackie Mcshane vs Mckenzie Kleinhenz / Madeline Waud1-6, 2-6
2026-03-23vs Vane/Butera/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesColleen Harris / Meaghan Stranix vs Brooke Keane / Brooke Vane7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Fitzsimmons vs Holly Fisher1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Hasebroock / Sarah Esposito vs ASHLEY CUA / Jourdan Hurd0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMeghan Delaney vs Sabrina Butera0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Patten / Brooke Christianson vs Nobu Junge / Kelli Alarcon3-6, 2-6
2026-03-09vs Hammrich/Dyer/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesColleen Harris / Taryn Hickey vs Paige Succop / Casey Dyer7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeaghan Stranix vs Jamie Walker4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fitzsimmons / Meredith Schapman vs Aiyda Cobb / Courtney Mclarty2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Patten vs Olivia Dial5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Mcshane / Meghan Delaney vs Chanel Doree / Lindsey Burroughs4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Meaghan Stranix
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.84
Taryn Hickey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Emily Patten
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.61
Jennifer Fitzsimmons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Colleen Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Samantha Harber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Meghan Luebbert
published
2.42
Sarah Esposito
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Meghan Delaney
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.27
Jackie Mcshane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Abby Kienzler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Brooke Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Meredith Schapman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.98
Beth Hasebroock
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Christianson + Emily Patten1531% games−13.4% vs expected
Samantha Harber + Meaghan Stranix033 matchesnot enough data
Abby Kienzler + Jackie Mcshane123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Hasebroock + Meredith Schapman033 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Harris + Meredith Schapman123 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Mcshane + Meredith Schapman033 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Mcshane + Meghan Delaney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meaghan Stranix
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Taryn Hickey
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Emily Patten
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer Fitzsimmons
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Colleen Harris
4W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Samantha Harber
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.46
Meghan Luebbert
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.44
Sarah Esposito
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Meghan Delaney
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.38
2.5
Jackie Mcshane
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Abby Kienzler
4W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Brooke Christianson
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Meredith Schapman
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.11
2.5
Beth Hasebroock
0W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.