← Teams

GLVR-Kasch

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.05 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Kimbra Kasch
published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Nicole Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Jeremy Geschwind
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
published 3
2.60
Michael Parkhurst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Paull Kaady
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results9 ties
2023-05-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Michael McTague vs Beverly Placko / Rufus Timberlake4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Floyd / Michael Parkhurst vs Karoline Brock / Mitch Brock6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Lars Kasch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNicole Floyd / Jeremy Geschwind vs Michelle Boucher / William Seidl6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Russum / Paull Kaady vs Angela Jackson / Mark Rothert6-1, 6-2
2023-05-07Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJudy Friedman / Jeremy Geschwind vs Wes Milligan / Theresa Hagerty6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Prescott / Valerie Neill vs Terrence Trausch / Vanessa Gallant6-0, 6-3
2023-05-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDave Sasaki / Jennifer Pultz vs David Graham / Kathleen Cooney6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLars Kasch / Tammy Russum vs Robert Bennett-Hanes / Janene Larson6-0, 6-3
2023-04-29Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Michael McTague vs Lisa Carlisle-Pope / Dan Pope6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudy Friedman / David Prescott vs Barbara Schultz / Craig Tompkins6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Paull Kaady vs Kristi Tompkins / Feng-Yu Liu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-15Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Susanne Cochran / Pete Baughman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMichael Parkhurst / Nicole Floyd vs Tomoko Langworthy / Mike Olson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Frank Brown / Robin Burak6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Jennifer Pultz vs Kevin Grant / Trish Carder6-2, 7-5
2023-04-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDave Sasaki / Jennifer Pultz vs Gary Hallmark / Peg McClendon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Block / David Prescott vs James Greenblatt / Wendy Smith6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesValerie Neill / Paull Kaady vs David Law / Karen Law7-6, 6-3
2023-03-25Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Judy Friedman vs Margaret Convery / Alex Delarosa6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Prescott / Kimbra Kasch vs Caryn Cohen / Jonathan Guinn7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Kimbra Kasch
40W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
Nicole Floyd
35W–56L career
not enough data
—
3
Jeremy Geschwind
33W–57L career
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
15%85%0%
2.60
3
Michael Parkhurst
40W–84L career
15%85%0%
2.60
3
Paull Kaady
5W–12L career · type S
20%80%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.