Teams

Ashcraft 55+ 3.0 Day

2025 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring Day League - HSV · 3.0 Women 553D

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-02vs Piette DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Porter / Lynne Woodson vs Dorothy Patterson / Marilyn Porter1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSharon Houston / Rebecca Moore vs Summer Hines / Cynthia Garcia6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue Rogers / Jan Nosky vs Sherrill Altice / Rebecca Rieniets6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Piette DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Ashcraft / Bettie Romer vs Beth Berry / Dorothy Patterson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Davis / Sue Rogers vs Ellie Sternberg Lastinger / Carol Irle4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKerri Plankenhorn / Debra Harvel vs Tracy McMahan / Betsy Stookey4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-26vs Piette DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Lindig / Bettie Romer vs Linda Caplice / Tracy McMahan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKerri Plankenhorn / Jan Nosky vs Cheryl Piette / Betsy Stookey6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLynne Woodson / Debra Harvel vs Dorothy Patterson / Beth Berry7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-20vs Piette DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Porter / Sharon Houston vs Ellie Sternberg Lastinger / Beth Berry4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Woodson / Shannon Lindig vs Cynthia Garcia / Rebecca Rieniets6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrea Cantrell / Julie Ashcraft vs Sherrill Altice / Shelley Hopkins6-7, 3-6
2025-03-19vs Piette DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Lindig / Bettie Romer vs Beth Berry / Carol Irle2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Davis / Jan Nosky vs Linda Caplice / Marilyn Porter7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Moore / Andrea Cantrell vs Tracy McMahan / Summer Hines4-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Piette DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Cantrell / Kerri Plankenhorn vs Summer Hines / Linda Caplice1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Ashcraft / Bettie Romer vs Cynthia Garcia / Shelley Hopkins6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Moore / Debra Harvel vs Marilyn Porter / Tracy McMahan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-03vs Piette DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Rogers / Lynne Woodson vs Shelley Hopkins / Carol Irle4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Ashcraft / Shannon Lindig vs Summer Hines / Rebecca Rieniets6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRebecca Moore / Sharon Houston vs Beth Berry / Linda Caplice0-6, 3-6
2025-02-27vs Piette DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKerri Plankenhorn / Sue Rogers vs Rebecca Rieniets / Marilyn Porter6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Houston / Debra Harvel vs Summer Hines / Linda Caplice6-7, 4-6
2025-02-25vs Piette DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Ashcraft / Shannon Lindig vs Cheryl Piette / Betsy Stookey6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKerri Plankenhorn / Andrea Cantrell vs Marilyn Porter / Dorothy Patterson6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 553D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Shannon Lindig
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.84
Sue Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Julie Ashcraft
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Bettie Romer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Lynne Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Kerri Plankenhorn
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Andrea Cantrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Sharon Houston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Jan Nosky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Debra Harvel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Linda Marie Agee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Lindig + Julie Ashcraft4169% games+21.7% vs expected
Shannon Lindig + Lynne Woodson7748% games+2.9% vs expected
Kerri Plankenhorn + Andrea Cantrell2345% gamesnot enough data
Julie Ashcraft + Lynne Woodson1442% gamesnot enough data
Sue Rogers + Shannon Lindig314 matchesnot enough data
Sue Rogers + Julie Ashcraft213 matchesnot enough data
Sue Rogers + Lynne Woodson033 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Lindig + Bettie Romer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Lindig
95W–95L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Sue Rogers
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Julie Ashcraft
24W–29L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Bettie Romer
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynne Woodson
18W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kerri Plankenhorn
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Andrea Cantrell
7W–25L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Sharon Houston
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jan Nosky
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Debra Harvel
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Linda Marie Agee
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.