Teams

EBass/LThompson (Sardis)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 7:00 PM
vs
Sardis Swim & Racquet Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
vs
Olde Providence Racquet Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
vs
Blakeney Racquet and Swim Club
Sep 29 7:00 PM
Windyrush Country Club
2026-09-01vs VTolson/Petras (FCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKate Johnson / Katherine Currier vs Kristen Petras / Christina Pardi5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Foley / Katie Ferry vs Jennifer Pollino / Tracy McLaughlin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHeather Carter / Jennifer Zarins vs Bethany Ronchetta / Deb Sokol6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-25vs CMiles (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Ferry / Elizabeth Tabor vs Cathy Cagney / Miranda Berkovich6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Bass / Mandy Occhipinti vs Barbara Clement / Karen Moss6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Egelson / Lindsay Thompson vs Ann Stawski / Maria Solorzano6-7, 1-6
2026-08-18vs LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Zarins / Naomi O'Brien vs Stephanie Gossert / Kelly DiCristo6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Carter / Lauren DiLuzio vs Yukiko Cooper / ANGELA BOREK0-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Phelan / Judy Kilduff vs Becky Shopf / Carolyn Henderson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Naomi O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alison Egelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Emily Bass
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Katie Ferry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Judy Kilduff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Holly Foley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Patricia Phelan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Heather Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Katherine Currier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Elizabeth Tabor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mandy Occhipinti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kate Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Zarins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren DiLuzio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Johnson + Emily Bass4156% games+16.6% vs expected
Holly Foley + Heather Carter6451% games+11.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Tabor + Holly Foley4256% games+3.8% vs expected
Katherine Currier + Heather Carter3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Naomi O'Brien
134W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Alison Egelson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Emily Bass
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Katie Ferry
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.10
3
Judy Kilduff
48W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Holly Foley
77W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Patricia Phelan
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Heather Carter
35W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Katherine Currier
32W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Elizabeth Tabor
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Mandy Occhipinti
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kate Johnson
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
Jennifer Zarins
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren DiLuzio
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.